To: SquirrelKing
Three things I have not agreed with President Bush on, immigration, education bill and medicare. But I love my president. He is a good, Christian, decent man who I believe has the best interests of this country at heart. I will never desert him. I have already signed up here in Miami to work the election. The alternative is unthinkable. Oh, and by the way I have one word, JUDGES. No three words, SUPREME COURT JUDGES.
To: rep-always
Bye the way SquirrelKing great post.
To: rep-always
>>quote
Oh, and by the way I have one word, JUDGES. No three words, SUPREME COURT JUDGES.
one word:
bullshit
check the record, a MAJORITY of the SCOTUS is reptile appointed, and they could not find 4 that would even listen to arguement on Silveira
then turned around and ok'd CFR trashing the primary civil right we *had*
I don't know the answer, but the only way to fix this issue, if it can be fixed is get a conservative constitutionaly informed majority in both houses of congress and start impeaching the tyrants.
appointing 'conservative' judges has not proven to work at all
I still can't figure out what constitution the are reading it sure isn't mine.
George the Duce may appoint less liberal judges but the current track record of 'conservative justice' is pretty sorry.
r
46 posted on
01/29/2004 6:54:40 AM PST by
woerm
(student of history)
To: rep-always
Oh, and by the way I have one word, JUDGES. No three words, SUPREME COURT JUDGES.Bush has had four years. What has he got done? Pickering's recess appointment will expire, BTW.
A Democrat president can expect even stiffer opposition from a Republican-controlled Senate.
52 posted on
01/29/2004 7:03:49 AM PST by
Kevin Curry
(Dems' magnificent four: Shrieking Nikita, Frenchie La Lurch , Gen. Jack D. Ripper, and Lionel Putz)
To: rep-always
JUDGES. No three words, SUPREME COURT JUDGES. No doubt about it, we don't need a liberal naming any more judges anytime soon. I could wish that the president had not signed a "law abridging the freedom . . . of the press," but at least the judges he would name are less likely to approve that, rather than certain to.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson