[Byron_the_Aussie]

...perhaps I am just used to a more traditional, less histrionic style...

Clinton style, perhaps?

It's your preference for style over substance that puts his kind in the White House. Grow up.

[Huck]

It's your preference for style over substance that puts his kind in the White House.

I didn't notice anyone expressing a preference for style OVER substance. I noticed someone expressly stating that while the content was OK, they had some difficulty with the presentation style. You think that's out of bounds? For a guy who makes his living in public speaking?

Grow up.

You first. Seriously, get a grip on reality. Alan Keyes has a very bombastic, verbose, pompous, self-righteous style that turns some people off. I see nothing wrong with someone discussing that fact with others who may have encountered him.

[tcuoohjohn]

Actually no..I was thinking more about a more naturalistic style along the lines of Reagan.

Now whatever bee you have up your butt I suggest you dispense with it. Your assertion that I prefer style of substance suggests to me that you either failed to read my post or you failed to understand it. Either way the problem is yours. Dr. Keyes,is as I said a very well reasoned spokesman for the conservative cause. I might suggest that cause would be further enhanced if Dr. Keyes could get elected to the Senate or House. My point is that as a matter of practical politics his style may well be an impediment to his getting elected. And in the end winning is the measure of poltical effectiveness is it not?

As to the Clinton style?..Smarmy, overwrought, and manipulative?..no thanks.

Now that we have sorted out your puerile post I am more than happy to entertain your following posts provided you can pull yourself together and act like an adult.

Thanks...This Message brought to by the Freeper Committee For the Better Forum Experience.

[tcuoohjohn]

Actually no..I was thinking more about a more naturalistic style along the lines of Reagan.

Now whatever bee you have up your butt I suggest you dispense with it. Your assertion that I prefer style of substance suggests to me that you either failed to read my post or you failed to understand it. Either way the problem is yours. Dr. Keyes,is as I said a very well reasoned spokesman for the conservative cause. I might suggest that cause would be further enhanced if Dr. Keyes could get elected to the Senate or House. My point is that as a matter of practical politics his style may well be an impediment to his getting elected. And in the end winning is the measure of poltical effectiveness is it not?

As to the Clinton style?..Smarmy, overwrought, and manipulative?..no thanks.

Now that we have sorted out your puerile post I am more than happy to entertain your following posts provided you can pull yourself together and act like an adult.

Thanks...This Message brought to by the Freeper Committee For the Better Forum Experience.