Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: realpatriot71
Plenty - my degree was in molecular biology, and the science of human disease is basically problems at the biochemical/molecular level of cells. I don't have to believe in evolution as a means of origins to understand any of this.

I am stunned really. A major problem facing medicine is antibiotic resistance. Some bugs have acquired not only beneficial mutations but have evolved entire systems to evade certain drugs. Ever learn about vancomycin resistance? Please do not become one of these doctors that perscribes penicillin for the flu.

Furthermore, if you have had any experience with DNA sequence alignment and homology search programs you probably have noticed that nucleotide sequences of "ancient" genes (rRNAs, cytochromes etc) diverge exactly as evolutionary theory would predict. Is it all a huge coincidence? Can a reasonable person examine all of this data and not conclude common ancestry? What other hypothesis could possibly explain this?

310 posted on 01/30/2004 12:05:09 PM PST by RightWingNilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies ]


To: RightWingNilla
I am stunned really. A major problem facing medicine is antibiotic resistance. Some bugs have acquired not only beneficial mutations but have evolved entire systems to evade certain drugs. Ever learn about vancomycin resistance? Please do not become one of these doctors that perscribes penicillin for the flu.

I have to believe in the theory of evolution to understand bacterial resistance? Hardly! The resistance phenomenon is not that hard to understand, you give a population with an exponential growth curve a selective pressure, and watch said organism either (1) die or (2) adapt and live.

Why would I presrcibe an antibitotic for a viral dz?

Furthermore, if you have had any experience with DNA sequence alignment and homology search programs you probably have noticed that nucleotide sequences of "ancient" genes (rRNAs, cytochromes etc) diverge exactly as evolutionary theory would predict. Is it all a huge coincidence? Can a reasonable person examine all of this data and not conclude common ancestry? What other hypothesis could possibly explain this?

I don't find evolution completely irrational. Science works with what it can. No other pure scientific hypothesis can currently explain what is objective. Although as a believer in Creation, I do believe in common ancestors, only these were fully formed ancestors.

323 posted on 01/30/2004 1:04:54 PM PST by realpatriot71 (It's time to build a freakin' wall!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson