To: Penner
How is this a problem? If she takes the veep spot, one of three things happens:
1. They lose, and she gains nothing but a boost to her resume.
2. They win. She waits her turn, and runs 8 years later, win or lose the second term, it won't really hurt her.
3. They win. She decides she can't wait that long and has her new friend asassinated.
Sounds like a winner to me.
I don't see the problem here.
To: zbigreddogz
Thats the way my thoughts are running. Tha assination theory.
To: zbigreddogz
You are correct. Those who say she'll never take the number two slot, yada yada yada, are not considering strategy and the big picture.
To: zbigreddogz
She decides she can't wait that long and has her new friend asassinatedBy a right-wing Christian with an "assault weapon".
The new Reichstag fire.
34 posted on
01/29/2004 4:36:49 AM PST by
Jim Noble
(Now you go feed those hogs before they worry themselves into anemia!)
To: zbigreddogz
Running for VP in a losing campaign didn't do much to advance Geraldine Ferraro's political fortunes. I can't recall a VP nomination in a losing ticket that went on to higher office later. Most of them slip into political obscurity or become "expert political analysts". Lieberman was wise enough to keep his Senate seat or he would have become just an asterisk and he's going nowhere in his bid this year. The odds are against Hillary defying the trend.
I'm wracking my brain and I can't recall Dukakis' VP candidate.
43 posted on
01/29/2004 5:54:52 AM PST by
randita
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson