[Howlin]

Here's are a few posts to add to the pot:

To: Conservative Coulter Fan

And some of the reasons why we should vote to re-elect President Bush are:

Bush won't hand over U.S. sovereignty to the U.N. like Kerry, Dean, Edwards, et al, will.

Bush will defend America rather than surrendering to the French, et al, like Kerry, Dean, Edwards, et al, will.

Bush won't sign onto America killers like Kyoto or the so-called world court, world government, etc., like Kerry, Dean, Edwards, et al, will.

Bush is pro-life, pro-marriage, pro-family, pro-America, pro-God and will NOT appoint liberal activist judges like Kerry, Dean, Edwards, et al, will.

If you are at all interested in stopping the Marxist liberal take-over of America, then here's the place to draw the line.

68 posted on 01/28/2004 2:34:38 PM EST by Jim Robinson (I don't belong to no organized political party. I'm a Republycan.)

[Jim Robinson]

And some of the reasons why we should vote to re-elect President Bush are:

Bush won't hand over U.S. sovereignty to the U.N. like Kerry, Dean, Edwards, et al, will.

Bush will defend America rather than surrendering to the French, et al, like Kerry, Dean, Edwards, et al, will.

Bush won't sign onto America killers like Kyoto or the so-called world court, world government, etc., like Kerry, Dean, Edwards, et al, will.

Bush is pro-life, pro-marriage, pro-family, pro-America, pro-God and will NOT appoint liberal activist judges like Kerry, Dean, Edwards, et al, will.

If you are at all interested in stopping the Marxist liberal take-over of America, then here's the place to draw the line.

[Lazamataz]

I'd respond to each of these points but I'd rather not anger Jim.

I wish you had made your own points so that I could address them.

[prairiebreeze]

I'm on very slow dialup in this hotel but signed on and pinged here. Looks as if the usual suspects are up in arms about the President signing monies for the NEA....but that provision was added to the budget by Congress, correct?

And isn't this precisely why the President has been arguing for line-item veto??

Those here that don't think that a Presidetn doesn't hold his nose when signing certain things, but signs it anyway because otherwise, entire bills are killed and a lot of things aren't ever accomplished.....aren't thinking, as usual.

Do I have it summed up fairly well on my slow dial up?

Prairie