Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Is Said to Seek More Money for Arts [$15 million to $20 million for NEA]
New York Times ^ | January 29, 2004 | ROBERT PEAR

Posted on 01/28/2004 8:29:35 PM PST by yonif

WASHINGTON, Jan. 28 — President Bush will seek a big increase in the budget of the National Endowment for the Arts, the largest single source of support for the arts in the United States, administration officials said on Wednesday.

The proposal is part of a turnaround for the agency, which was once fighting for its life, attacked by some Republicans as a threat to the nation's moral standards.

Laura Bush plans to announce the request on Thursday, in remarks intended to show the administration's commitment to the arts, aides said.

Administration officials, including White House budget experts, said that Mr. Bush would propose an increase of $15 million to $20 million for the coming fiscal year, which begins Oct. 1. That would be the largest rise in two decades and far more than the most recent increases, about $500,000 for 2003 and $5 million for this year.

The agency has a budget of $121 million this year, 31 percent lower than its peak of $176 million in 1992. After Republicans gained control of Congress in 1995, they cut the agency's budget to slightly less than $100 million, and the budget was essentially flat for five years.

In an e-mail message inviting arts advocates to a news briefing with Mrs. Bush, Dana Gioia, the poet who is chairman of the endowment, says, "You will be present for an important day in N.E.A. history."

Mr. Gioia (pronounced JOY-uh) has tried to move beyond the culture wars that swirled around the agency for years. He has nurtured support among influential members of Congress, including conservative Republicans like Representatives Charles H. Taylor and Sue Myrick of North Carolina. He has held workshops around the country to explain how local arts organizations can apply for assistance.

Public support for the arts was hotly debated in the 1990's. Conservatives complained that the agency was financing obscene or sacrilegious works by artists like Robert Mapplethorpe and Andres Serrano. Former Senator Jesse Helms, Republican of North Carolina, repeatedly tried to eliminate the agency.

Some new money sought by Mr. Bush would expand initiatives with broad bipartisan support, like performances of Shakespeare's plays and "Jazz Masters" concert tours.

Mrs. Bush also plans to introduce a new initiative, "American Masterpieces: Three Centuries of Artistic Genius." This would combine art presentations — from painting and literature to music and dance — with education programs. The program would give large numbers of students around the country a chance to see exhibitions and performances.

New York receives a large share of the endowment's grants. But under federal law, the agency also gives priority to projects that cater to "underserved populations," including members of minority groups in urban neighborhoods with high poverty rates.

The president's proposal faces an uncertain future at a time of large budget deficits.

Melissa Schwartz, a spokeswoman for the Association of Performing Arts Presenters, an advocacy group, said, "We'll be fighting tooth and nail for the increase."

Some conservatives, like Representative Tom Tancredo, Republican of Colorado, vowed to oppose the increase. Even without support from the government, he said, "art would thrive in America."

Representative Louise M. Slaughter, a New York Democrat who is co-chairwoman of the Congressional Arts Caucus, said she was delighted to learn of Mr. Bush's proposal.

"There's nothing in the world that helps economic development more than arts programs," Ms. Slaughter said. "It was foolish for Congress to choke them and starve them. We should cherish the people who can tell us who we are, where we came from and where we hope to go."

Mr. Tancredo expressed dismay. "We are looking at record deficit and potential cuts in all kinds of programs," he said. "How can I tell constituents that I'll take money away from them to pay for somebody else's idea of good art? I have no more right to do that than to finance somebody else's ideas about religion."

The agency has long had support from some Republicans, like Representatives Christopher Shays of Connecticut and Jim Leach of Iowa.

"Government involvement is designed to take the arts from the grand citadel of the privileged and bring them to the public at large," Mr. Leach said. "This democratization of the arts ennobles the American experience."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: biggovernment; laurabush; nea; notconservatism; presidentbush; spending
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440441-460461-480 ... 1,001-1,004 next last
To: B Knotts
No time to apply for a grant. I'm off to work so I can pay taxes to support some 'starving' artist.
441 posted on 01/29/2004 6:51:03 AM PST by kristinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 431 | View Replies]

To: Johnny_Cipher
It's your choice. As it should be for every citizen of their respective state. I have just chosen to not base my vote on a letter of the alphabet
442 posted on 01/29/2004 6:52:00 AM PST by billbears (Deo Vindice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 437 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Where can I get my grant? Will Bush give me $100,000.00? I demand my $100,000.00!!!

You "true conservatives" aren't exactly up to Shakesperian standards.

Although you all may find opportunites in the soap opera industry, IMO.

443 posted on 01/29/2004 6:52:06 AM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 429 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Where can I get my grant? Will Bush give me $100,000.00? I demand my $100,000.00!!!

First you need to go on stage, buck nekkid, slather yourself with chocolate syrup, and whine about how oppressed you are.

444 posted on 01/29/2004 6:52:39 AM PST by malakhi (ICJ vs. Israel? Let's build a fence around The Hague.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 429 | View Replies]

To: malakhi
slather yourself with chocolate syrup

I think the "artists" are using more objectionable substances these days.

445 posted on 01/29/2004 6:54:05 AM PST by B Knotts (Go 'Nucks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 444 | View Replies]

To: GSWarrior
And we have the Bush Whitehouse actively seeking someone to run against Tancredo.

NO WAY!

That's it. I'm out.

446 posted on 01/29/2004 6:54:28 AM PST by Lazamataz (Have you prayed to President Bush today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 434 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
I think the "artists" are using more objectionable substances these days.

I admit, I'm out of touch! ;o)

447 posted on 01/29/2004 6:54:39 AM PST by malakhi (ICJ vs. Israel? Let's build a fence around The Hague.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 445 | View Replies]

To: malakhi
First you need to go on stage, buck nekkid, slather yourself with chocolate syrup, and whine about how oppressed you are.

That was during the Clinton years. Haven't heard about such outrages since Bush has been in.

448 posted on 01/29/2004 6:54:49 AM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 444 | View Replies]

To: yonif
What me worry. With a deficit projected to be about $477billion, what's another $20million? Pander here, pander there - pretty soon you cover all the bases.

Remember, deficits don't matter, just keep on spending.
449 posted on 01/29/2004 6:55:16 AM PST by familyofman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane
I am always amazed at the people who gripe that they will not vote for "the lesser of two evils." This statement presupposes that there could be a choice of a perfect candidate vs. a bad one.

In any presidential election we are given the choice of two flawed men. Our responsibility is to choose the one which we believe will do the best job of running the nation. Stomping our feet in anger, choosing a fringe candidate to "send a message," and turning out a decent president for an obvious anti-American are NOT what the purpose of an election is.

450 posted on 01/29/2004 6:55:30 AM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 440 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Vote Dubya!

Because your money SHOULD be redistributed to sicko lefty artists!


451 posted on 01/29/2004 6:55:34 AM PST by KantianBurke (2+2 does NOT equal 5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 441 | View Replies]

To: malakhi
First you need to go on stage, buck nekkid, slather yourself with chocolate syrup, and whine about how oppressed you are.

Well, I'm buck naken and covered with chocolate syrup right now.

Can I at least get $50,000?

452 posted on 01/29/2004 6:55:50 AM PST by Lazamataz (Have you prayed to President Bush today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 444 | View Replies]

To: Johnny_Cipher
With the exception of the war on terror, and the tax cuts I do not see why I would vote for Bush. The Republican have become just like the Democrats when it comes to spending. This is a complete outrage! The Republican always would say they are not the party of big government. What a complete lie. I have just about had it with Bush, and his caving in to all special interest. Education spending(with Ted the drink Kennedy), Campaign finance, Amnesty program, and now the NEA! I have just about had it with Bush, and all his Liberal bed wetting spending programs!
453 posted on 01/29/2004 6:56:00 AM PST by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 437 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Will the last person out of FR please turn off the lights?

(And leave the URLs for those Ann Coulter pics - its fun to watch the little vein on my wife's forehead throb when I open them).

454 posted on 01/29/2004 6:56:05 AM PST by Johnny_Cipher (Miserable failure = http://www.michaelmoore.com/ sounds good to me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 446 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
NO WAY!

That's it. I'm out.

Bye, have fun. Oh make sure you don't buy a bridge from someone on the street corner.

Just warning you, since you seem prone to beleive internet rumors.

455 posted on 01/29/2004 6:56:36 AM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 446 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
To be fair, I think that's mainly a rumor, for which I have not seen any verification. OTOH, I wouldn't be suprised in the least if Rove & Co. did something like that.

BTW, that tagline just about made me blow coffee through my nose. ;-)

456 posted on 01/29/2004 6:57:30 AM PST by B Knotts (Go 'Nucks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 446 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Just follow the money and it leads to, among other things, agri-business.
457 posted on 01/29/2004 6:58:02 AM PST by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 446 | View Replies]

To: Dane
I'm going to vote only for people I respect, like, and mostly agree with.

Period.

And no amount of yammering will ever change that.

458 posted on 01/29/2004 6:58:27 AM PST by Lazamataz (Have you prayed to President Bush today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 435 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
In any presidential election we are given the choice of two flawed men. Our responsibility is to choose the one which we believe will do the best job of running the nation. Stomping our feet in anger, choosing a fringe candidate to "send a message," and turning out a decent president for an obvious anti-American are NOT what the purpose of an election is

But it is all about principle, don't you know. The principle of being totally ignorant of the American political landscape.

459 posted on 01/29/2004 6:58:51 AM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 450 | View Replies]

To: Sprite518
Would government become any smaller with a President Kerry or Clinton? If you think so, then vote for 'em.
460 posted on 01/29/2004 6:59:33 AM PST by Johnny_Cipher (Miserable failure = http://www.michaelmoore.com/ sounds good to me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 453 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440441-460461-480 ... 1,001-1,004 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson