To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
You sound like Kerry, Dean, pick em "Raising taxes on the rich will pay for schools, healthcare, etc etc." 2+2 doesn't equal 4 there.
I personally wouldn't spend a red cent on the NEA but I'm willing to hear what the actual plan is before I get fired up about it.
An aside: V a V guns in the cockpit, if it was allowed tomorrow the pilots would all buy their own by the next day. The gov wouldn't have to spend a dime. The dudes making 250 large could pick up their own tab or the company that wants to charge me $4 a beer on the plane.
247 posted on
01/28/2004 7:14:19 PM PST by
HRoarke
(Benedict Arnold was a Veteran too!)
To: HRoarke
IMO you commentary was not well reasoned. First, I don't believe I came across as "Kerry, Dean...", whatever THAT means. Second I don't believe in "Raising taxes on the rich will pay for schools, healthcare, etc etc." or 2+2 doesn't equal 4 there. And maybey I agree that guns in the cockpits could be had for far less than I suggested.
But I was merely drawing loose comparisons to make a point regarding NEA funding vs national security issues. Could you really be so dense that you missed that altogether? Jeeez.
763 posted on
01/28/2004 9:42:03 PM PST by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
(Any day you wake up is a good day.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson