[Cubs Fan]

--There's nothing ambiguous about it." Except that she did not use the words lying, unethical, or even misleading. Nothing ambiguous when you put words in that are not there....---

Okay RS then why exactly is she "personally and professionally disappointed in him"?

(hint because he lied, and even the OJ jury could see that)

Just like a liberal the more the facts come out the more your arguments lose logic and become emotion.

[RS]

"Okay RS then why exactly is she "personally and professionally disappointed in him"?"

Do you seriosly want my speculation ?

You seem to be touting yours as if you could read her mind - do lawyers normally write letters requiring people to "guess" what they mean ? Is there a secret Clinton codebook that lawyers use so they can call people lying, unethical or misleading without actually saying that ?

Next thing we will be getting a definition of what is "is"