Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Explorer hole could be devastating
Infoworld ^ | 01/28/04 | Kieren McCarthy

Posted on 01/28/2004 1:10:12 PM PST by Salo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-250 next last
To: Bush2000
The ActiveX control does not know the absolute path to "C:\Documents and Settings\[USER]\Local Settings\Temp" because it lacks knowledge of who the "[USER]" is.

It appears to work fine on my Windows XP laptop.

21 posted on 01/28/2004 2:00:14 PM PST by justlurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
That's interesting. Does it run as a different user?

No, the attack just hardcodes the path to "C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\foobar.exe" and runs within the context of the current user.
22 posted on 01/28/2004 2:00:24 PM PST by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: mhking
I've been using Firebird for about two weeks now. I love the tabbed browser windows. I don't see me going back to exlorer any time soon.



23 posted on 01/28/2004 2:00:29 PM PST by Outlaw76 (Citizens on the Bounce!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: justlurking
It appears to work fine on my Windows XP laptop.

You're either lying -- or you're tuning the sample to your config. There's no way that it can run an executable from C:\WINDOWS\TEMP under XP when the exe will be downloaded to C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\[USER]\Local Settings\Temp
24 posted on 01/28/2004 2:02:08 PM PST by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
So if you are running as an admin, as most home machines do, you could be in for a world of hurt?
25 posted on 01/28/2004 2:02:52 PM PST by Salo (You have the right to free speech - as long as you are not dumb enough to actually try it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: mhking
Yup. Been using Firebird for about 3 months now, and got the Thunderbird mail client too. Best browser I've ever used.
26 posted on 01/28/2004 2:05:50 PM PST by djf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
You're either lying -- or you're tuning the sample to your config.

I'm doing neither. I'm simply running the demo:

http://secunia.com/Internet_Explorer_File_Download_Extension_Spoofing_Test/

If I understand it correctly, they are claiming that you can be led to believe you are opening an PDF file, instead of something else.

The demo actually opens an HTML file. But, it could just as easily be an executable. If I can figure out all the details, I'll create a better demo.

BTW, Mozilla Firebird will do something similar, with one exception: it will tell you that you are opening an HTML file, rather than a PDF file. Since Firebird will warn you separately about opening an executable file, the protection is a little better, but not foolproof for people that open attachments in email from unknown senders.

27 posted on 01/28/2004 2:16:13 PM PST by justlurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Salo
Microsoft gave up on properly supporting IE months ago.

http://www.safecenter.net/UMBRELLAWEBV4/ie_unpatched/index.html
28 posted on 01/28/2004 2:25:33 PM PST by sigSEGV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salo
First MyDoom and then this. Not a good start to the year for Microsoft. And they still haven't fixed the flaw found in December, which can be used in conjunction with this.

Oh, I figured it out. MS wanted to have that patch-free month, so they just decided not to release patches for known security flaws.
29 posted on 01/28/2004 2:30:37 PM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
A bit of additional info: the Adobe Acrobat plugin is usually launched immediately when one clicks on a PDF link.

However, this exploit prompts you for the download, which is unusual behavior if you recognize it. The issue seems to be the ability to obscure the true type of the file being downloaded.

30 posted on 01/28/2004 2:35:31 PM PST by justlurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
You're either lying -- or you're tuning the sample to your config. There's no way that it can run an executable from C:\WINDOWS\TEMP under XP when the exe will be downloaded to C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\[USER]\Local Settings\Temp

BUSH LIED!!!

No, not the President, just the uneducated pretender who uses his name. ;)

It could always just point to c:\Documents and Settings\%username%\

Type that into your browser if you don't believe me, or from a dos promt, type
c: (if you aren't already on the c: disk)
cd \Documents and Settings\%username%\

Ever hear of an ENVIRONMENT VARIABLE, Bushie? You are farm league, yet you feign skillz.
31 posted on 01/28/2004 2:42:38 PM PST by adam_az (Be vewy vewy qwiet, I'm hunting weftists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: yall
Just another example of Bush 2000's technical skills being purely bush league, aka all bushed out.
32 posted on 01/28/2004 2:43:16 PM PST by adam_az (Be vewy vewy qwiet, I'm hunting weftists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Salo
".....demonstrates that if you click on a link, and select “Open” ....."

If you click on a link and select "open" your computer should kick your butt - and then go out and kick the butt of the fool who put the "open" button there in the first place.
33 posted on 01/28/2004 2:53:46 PM PST by RS (Just because they're out to get him doesn't mean he's not guilty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: adam_az
BUSH LIED!!!

No, he didn't lie. He just made an error. Given the vague description of the exploit, it's not reasonable to expect everyone to interpret it correctly.

However, when given an opportunity to correct his mistake, he instead escalated to an accusation of fabrication.

34 posted on 01/28/2004 4:01:36 PM PST by justlurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Salo
Use another browser, such as Opera at http://www.opera.com
35 posted on 01/28/2004 4:13:34 PM PST by AdmSmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mhking
Firebird flag.

I think I'll try it. How big is it?
36 posted on 01/28/2004 4:21:58 PM PST by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Principled
I think I'll try it. How big is it?

The entire folder, once installed is somewhere around 13MB, so it's not too big...

37 posted on 01/28/2004 4:26:09 PM PST by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: mhking
So mhking recommends i to principled?

Is it Red Hat or some such?
38 posted on 01/28/2004 4:34:26 PM PST by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Principled
i=it

and Mozilla... who does Mozilla?
39 posted on 01/28/2004 4:35:49 PM PST by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: mhking
I have no worries...


40 posted on 01/28/2004 4:41:19 PM PST by Prime Choice (I'm pro-choice. I just think the "choice" should be made *before* having sex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-250 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson