[Eva]

Your analogy is a total non-sequitur. There is no similarity between a proclamation of doom by Rush Limbaugh and a declaration of a threat posed by Saddam Hussein that was proclaimed by two different administrations over a period of over ten years.

[Peach]

Kennedy claiming a manipulation of the evidence, despite the fact that Kay said there was no pressure from the administration and he has been given ALL the intelligence reports available.

[Huck]

Your analogy is a total non-sequitur

Well, I don't know if I'd call it an analogy. It was a related experience, in that in both cases I was confronted with a subject that I don't know a lot about, where I decided to see if a trusted source was correct on the subject. In both cases, they turned out to be incorrect. For me, the experience was similar. Actually, the President is doing better than Rush, because at least the Admin is putting the truth out there, via Kay's testimony. I doubt Rush ever admitted how wrong he was about the economy.