Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cyncooper
Levin asking why Cheney is still saying those vans are "conclusive evidence" that there were WMD?

Did Cheney say that they were "conclusive?"

OMG...........Kay broadsides Levin: "Yes, I did see evidence that could lead one to think that they WERE for biological weapons!"
123 posted on 01/28/2004 8:48:24 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]


To: Howlin
Levin asking why Cheney is still saying those vans are "conclusive evidence" that there were WMD?

Why don't you ask the Vice President, idiot?

132 posted on 01/28/2004 8:49:31 AM PST by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin
Levin dribbles..shoots..AIRBALL!
135 posted on 01/28/2004 8:49:50 AM PST by babaloo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin
Levin asking why Cheney is still saying those vans are "conclusive evidence" that there were WMD? ,

Levin is trying to push for Indpendent Council investigation

137 posted on 01/28/2004 8:50:39 AM PST by Mo1 (Join the dollar a day crowd now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin
Levin asking why Cheney is still saying those vans are "conclusive evidence" that there were WMD?

Because it's undebatable there were WMD's (and there may still be). Saddam used them. Tell it to the Kurds and the Iranians that they never existed.
155 posted on 01/28/2004 8:54:38 AM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson