[HalfIrish]

If the immigration hawks would just tone it down .. they would have heard that there is not enough support to get the legislation through congress .. it's already DOA.

I hope you're right. But I place little credence in what Bush apologists say. For example, they said that Bush would veto the CFR bill. Then, when he caved we were told it was "strategery" since the SCOTUS would declare it unconstitutional. Surprise, surprise - now we're stuck with it. There are lots more examples of the same pattern but some people turn a blind eye to it. Don't be one of them.

[CyberAnt]

Well .. I for one never said that about CFR. In fact, I was one of many who wanted the President to veto it.

But .. the President is who he is .. and he has a right to support and put forward those things he thinks are important. And while I don't necessarily agree with several of those things .. I would never consider not voting (or not volunteering my time to the RNC) .. and I would never consider voting for a democrat.

If that makes me an apologist .. so be it!

[The_Eaglet]

Campaign Finance Reform thread-day 47