Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
Looks like the voting choice is turning out as this:

Socialism with Security = Bush.

Socialism without Security= Whoever runs against Bush.
106 posted on 01/28/2004 7:51:12 AM PST by Rebelbase ( <a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com" target="_blank">miserable failure put it in your tagline too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]


To: Rebelbase; RiflemanSharpe
Looks like the voting choice is turning out as this:
Socialism with Security = Bush.
Socialism without Security= Whoever runs against Bush.
I don't like socialism, and the federal does not have the authority to force it upon every state.

Presidential candidate Michael Peroutka seeks to remove socialism from the federal government and let the states and the people decide according to the reserved powers described in the Tenth Amendment.

109 posted on 01/28/2004 8:16:46 AM PST by The_Eaglet (Conservative chat on IRC: http://searchirc.com/search.php?F=exact&T=chan&N=33&I=conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson