Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: William McKinley
In the 1970s, they did. In the 1970s and 1980s, Muammar Qaddafi was providing terrorists safe haven, money, and support for attacks, inclduing the bombing of a Belrin disco intended to kill Americans.

They have apparently shifted course in the 1990s - and they could be useful if we wanted to launch some attacks on Iran with "plausible deniability" in the near future. If Qaddafi is redeemable, then this group arguably is as well.
37 posted on 01/27/2004 9:49:17 AM PST by hchutch (Why did the Nazgul run from Arwen's flash flood? All they managed to do was to end up dying tired.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: hchutch
Read my article on the Cult of Rajavi. If you still think, after reading it, that there is a chance that this group could somehow be redeemable, well, we're just going to have to disagree.

And if they still belong on the terror list or not, it doesn't change the fact that they are using humanitarian-sounding events as fundraisers for their cult. This should not be supported. It should be repudiated.

38 posted on 01/27/2004 9:53:00 AM PST by William McKinley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson