Certainly. The point I was trying to make is that creationists critisize evolution for not being observable (When's the last time you saw a fish turn into a bird! Never? Ha! Evolution doesn't work). For the theory that man is degenerating to be any more credible, therefore, we would need to be able to observe humans degenerating. Seeing as the timeframe for this degeneration is only 6-10 K years, it would logically follow that we whould be seeing less-perfect humans popping up in the general population fairly commonly.
And Howard Dean doesn't count.
Damn, he almost had proof for his idea.