[Junior]

We cannot observe either in action.

Actually, there are numerous instances of observed speciation (a tenet of evolution). But, of course you've known of this, but can't bring yourself to admit it...

[Michael_Michaelangelo]

Talkorigins -- FAQ or Fiction?

[Gerasimov]

And actually, transmutation within a given species does not show an ability of evolution from one kind to another to occur, only that sub-speciation can be observed. Evolution on a micro sense clearly happens. Man is growing taller, and as in the article you linked to, evening primroses are able to mutate over several generations of pollination. (they happen to be my favorite flower, BTW. Truly amazing.) But you cannot observe, recreate, or devise an experiment to study the plausibility of macro evolution, or the changing of one kind to another

I won't convince you, you won't convince me. The evolutionists inability to admit that the theory of evolution as the origin of any kind is no more of an empirical science than creation does leave me somewhat confused, though.

I admit that I cannot observe and study creation. Creationism is outside the realm of empirical science. Faith is a large element of my belief in creation. Why can't you admit that you cannot observe and study evolution of the type necessary to rise man from the muck? An evolutionist requires as much faith as a creationist does.