Have you seen the actual evidence? Most of the fossil evidence for "pre-humans" won't even cover a coffee table, and yet the paleoanthropologists wants everyone to buy "hook, line, and sinker" that these bits and pieces respresent evidence of human evolution. Now we have a computer saying that monkey bones look closer to human to these bones, AND that the DNA doesn't look right and you still won't let it go?
Interesting . . .
Are you saying that neanderthals were not any more human than chimps?
Now we have a computer saying that monkey bones look closer to human to these bones, AND that the DNA doesn't look right and you still won't let it go?
Interesting . . .
Yes, your reaction is quite interesting.. Are you convinced we all came out of africa at some point fairly recently?
To think that we have trouble identifying offspring of people who lived 100 years ago, or even still living. If we could be sure we had all the evidence even though it only covers a coffeetable we could devise a coherent hypothesis. But we have barely begun to find evidence and every new find seems to force a change in the hypothesis rather than confirm the hypothesis. We're still early in the investigation.
Your coffee table must be a lot bigger than mine.