To: rcofdayton
well..Ken Starr investigated the matter fully with the full resources of the US Government. He is a very skilled lawyer and tends to be very thorough. After investigating he concluded that the allegation didn't merit being taken to the Grand Jury. Now either Ken Starr was wholly remiss in his conclusion or he was an agent of Bill Clinton. Take your pick.
49 posted on
01/28/2004 6:29:25 AM PST by
tcuoohjohn
(Follow The Money)
To: tcuoohjohn
Starr did not have sufficient evidence of who was guilty. It is clear a crime was committed and you are happy the Clinton administration got away with it. Hypocrite!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson