Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rcofdayton
well..Ken Starr investigated the matter fully with the full resources of the US Government. He is a very skilled lawyer and tends to be very thorough. After investigating he concluded that the allegation didn't merit being taken to the Grand Jury. Now either Ken Starr was wholly remiss in his conclusion or he was an agent of Bill Clinton. Take your pick.
49 posted on 01/28/2004 6:29:25 AM PST by tcuoohjohn (Follow The Money)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: tcuoohjohn
Starr did not have sufficient evidence of who was guilty. It is clear a crime was committed and you are happy the Clinton administration got away with it. Hypocrite!
50 posted on 01/28/2004 9:56:56 AM PST by rcofdayton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson