To: Miss Marple
Do date one of the few reasonable responses I've seen.
I disagree that anyone considering staying home or going third patry is supporting the rats. All we keep hearing about is how Bush will probably have a win as large as Reagan so in light of all these claims why is it considered sush heresy to disagree with certain policies and be vocal about it?
336 posted on
01/27/2004 9:36:57 AM PST by
Bikers4Bush
(Constitution party here I come. Write in Tancredo in 04'!)
To: Bikers4Bush
why is it considered sush heresy to disagree with certain policies and be vocal about it? Serious question for you. Do you write letters to your congresmen, fax the WH, write to the President or send in letters to your editor?
Prairie
349 posted on
01/27/2004 9:42:00 AM PST by
prairiebreeze
(WMD's in Iraq -- The absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence.)
To: Bikers4Bush
why is it considered such heresy to disagree with certain policies and be vocal about it? Excellent question.
350 posted on
01/27/2004 9:42:40 AM PST by
k2blader
(Folks who deny the President's proposal is an amnesty are being intellectually dishonest.)
To: Bikers4Bush
Apparently, yes.
363 posted on
01/27/2004 9:48:31 AM PST by
Doohickey
(The ultimate paradigm of government is the public restroom)
To: Bikers4Bush
why is it considered sush heresy to disagree with certain policies and be vocal about it?It's not. I've never read a single post that said it was.
Insecure, are we??
419 posted on
01/27/2004 10:32:54 AM PST by
ohioWfan
(BUSH 2004 - Leadership, Integrity, Morality)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson