Skip to comments.
Who says George W. Bush has done "nothing" for conservatives?
WhiteHouse.gov; various news sources ^
| 1/27/04
Posted on 01/27/2004 7:03:00 AM PST by Wolfstar
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380, 381-400, 401-420 ... 1,361-1,377 next last
To: Joe Hadenuf
Just a little humor, friend. Thanks.
381
posted on
01/27/2004 10:01:22 AM PST
by
MeekOneGOP
(Check out this HILARIOUS story !! haha!: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1060580/posts)
To: afropick
Impressive and thoughtful response! Your post is a Keeper!
382
posted on
01/27/2004 10:01:46 AM PST
by
arasina
(So there.)
To: MeekOneGOP
383
posted on
01/27/2004 10:02:23 AM PST
by
deport
(BUSH - CHENEY 2004.........)
To: PhiKapMom
Thanks ! Rumsfeld is the man !! I was elated when Bush first announced him for Defense.
384
posted on
01/27/2004 10:03:16 AM PST
by
MeekOneGOP
(Check out this HILARIOUS story !! haha!: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1060580/posts)
To: The Old Hoosier
I've not been seduced by some silly ring nor by anything else.
As you KNOW, this election is between a democrat and President Bush. The choice could not be more clear: President Bush by a landslide.
385
posted on
01/27/2004 10:04:18 AM PST
by
onyx
(Your secrets are safe with me and all my friends.)
To: All
Also Pres Bush does have a duty to protect the borders, but it does not help if the governors, mayors, and other local politicians refuse to enforce their own state and municipal laws. Democrats still hold a sizable number of the state legislatures and even if the Pres tried to deport even a small number of illegals, they would stampede to the nearest court, claming violations of civil rights.
386
posted on
01/27/2004 10:05:33 AM PST
by
afropick
(been off the dem plantation since 1999 and havent looked back!!!!)
To: Wolfstar; My2Cents
Thanks for putting this together.
Some of us need to read it over often, especially when we are sometimes disappointed by mistakes he, as all presidents make.
I can name a handful of things I consider to be pretty serious mistakes.As far as I am concerned, supporting Spector, and this immigration thing are a couple.
I want to forget those things for now and make sure he gets elected because overall I am very pleased.
Course I always love cowboys.
To: MJY1288; The Old Hoosier
Congress spends money, Bush did not attach the pork to those bills Here's how it has been working lately. A spending bill comes up - Congress wants 400 billion, Bush say he'll veto anything over 375 bil, they send him a 389 billion bill, and he signs it.
For me, a big spender President would ask if 400 was enough, how about 410? An obstructionist President would veto anything over 350, force a veto override and lose support for any of his pet bills (oh say like defense spending for the war), a realist conservative would slow spending as much as possible while using the compromise to build up support for key issues....like the war.
But that means knowing you'll win some and lose some in the nasty system of Washington. ('Democracy is a terrible form of government but it is better than anything else' attitude)
To: My2Cents
Thanks for the ping, it would have broke my heart to miss this one!
Dubya has certainly been busy :-)
From what I recall when Reagan was President, people weren't talking about his "greatness" in the first three years, either, it was essentially the same thing. Average folks liked him, many folks adored him, but he continued to come under loud vocal pressure from the Democrat Party and hard-core conservatives each time they weren't 100% happy with something he did.
I'm not going to wait five or ten years to talk about how "Great" Dubya is. Viewed through the lens of history it is already quite evident he is a hero for the Light Side and a bane to the Dark.
389
posted on
01/27/2004 10:09:06 AM PST
by
Tamzee
(W '04..... America may not survive a Democrat at this point in our history....)
To: Wolfstar
And you know, these things are all great accomplishments that conservatives can take great pride in.
I do.
But, there are also great disappoinments. The most glaring is the amnesty plan. The magnitude of the illegal alien invasion issue is so great, especially in California, that all the good Bush can do on other issues can be negated by his invitation to throngs of economic refugees in Mexico to come here.
What good is giving these "workers" legal status here when they then fall under the same minimum wage laws that employers will STILL try to get around by hiring the new wave of illegals?
What good is beefing up border security when Immigration agents and law enforcement have no power and are in fact barred from arresting illegals and deporting them?
The issue is rightly triggering criticism of Bush. Why he's doing this, I don't know. If he's taking a page from the Gray Davis Playbook of Pandering, this will blow up in his face and he'll have himself and Rove to blame.
390
posted on
01/27/2004 10:09:52 AM PST
by
StoneColdGOP
(McClintock - In Your Heart, You Know He's Right)
To: Wolfstar; Southack
Great job, I makes it very clear for any who wish to see, the great accomplishments of President Bush.
Bookmarked and bumped
To: afraidfortherepublic
I have read the proposal and suggest you do as well.
It is an amnesty and does condone illegal immigration. See below.
This program will offer legal status, as temporary workers, to the millions of undocumented men and women now employed in the United States,
Translated into straight talk:
This program will offer legal status, as temporary workers, to the millions of illegal aliens now employed in the United States,
If you still claim to not understand that quote, see my tagline.
392
posted on
01/27/2004 10:10:08 AM PST
by
k2blader
(Folks who deny the President's proposal is an amnesty are being intellectually dishonest.)
To: arasina
Thank you, all I want is a little perspective. The President is not a king, he cant, by the flick of the wrist, just impose laws left and right. Also states have just as much responsiblity to secure their border in as much, the states of arizona, california, new mexico, and texas. Those governors if they really wanted to call a state emergency and mobilize the national guard and enforce the border laws.
393
posted on
01/27/2004 10:13:02 AM PST
by
afropick
(been off the dem plantation since 1999 and havent looked back!!!!)
To: ohioWfan; dts32041
My response to the WSJ article this morning. I am not sure how many readers take the time to read newspaper on line reader comments, but I do not want to leave the critics of President Bush sole occupancy of any forum:-----
Getting the Bureaucracy to Move
--maica---
Thank you for discussing the reality of the immigration situation as it exists in the United States today. Too many conservatives are not facing reality; President Bush does. Obviously the status quo is not acceptable. Standards for residence in the U.S. have to be recognized by all--employers, local law enforcement officers, INS or homeland security management and officers, and elected officials across the country.
Right now there is no unity of action among all these various groups. To people who blame the employer group, I ask, why did you not blame the employers when the Democrats were in power in Washington? The INS appears to have had a policy of not cooperating with employers who had questions about documentation. Also the INS has been glacially slow in processing papers for persons trying to follow the rules of legal entry. If President Bush can change the behavior in the federal bureaucracy, it will go a long way to improving the situation for all in our country.
394
posted on
01/27/2004 10:15:12 AM PST
by
maica
(Mainstream America Is Conservative America)
To: LucyJo
I think the world of Cheney as well !
395
posted on
01/27/2004 10:15:27 AM PST
by
MeekOneGOP
(Check out this HILARIOUS story !! haha!: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1060580/posts)
To: k2blader
This program will offer legal status, as temporary workers, to the millions of undocumented men and women now employed in the United States,
Is there any penality proposed to those that chose to accept the offer? If they don't accept it then it doesn't apply to them is that correct?
396
posted on
01/27/2004 10:16:40 AM PST
by
deport
(BUSH - CHENEY 2004.........)
To: afraidfortherepublic
Our President did NOT propose an amnesty
He proposed to legalize millions of Illegal Aliens. Doesn't matter how the hairs are split, it's an Amnesty, just like the last big one.
Effect on Illegal Aliens |
Reagan Amnesty |
Bush Amnesty |
Legalizes millions, but not all, Illegal Aliens. |
Yes |
Yes |
Charges a fee to Illegal Aliens for legalization. |
Yes |
Yes |
Initially grants temporary, not permanent status to Illegal Aliens. |
Yes |
Yes |
Provides path for subsequent permanent status for legalized Illegals. |
Yes |
Yes |
Provides path to eventual U.S. citizenship for legalized Illegals. |
Yes |
Yes |
Wasn't officially called an Amnesty |
Yes |
Yes |
Take the Reagan Amnesty Pop Quiz! I need to do some research and add a new column for the Clinton Amnesties. I'm fairly certain all of the answers would be yes for him, as well, except that he only Amnestied a bit over a million Illegals. and is NOT condoning illegal entry. You can't propose to reward millions of Illegal Aliens with legal status without condoning illegal entry. This is the lesson of Amnesty, and it seems some need to learn it again. In the San Diego sector of the border "we have two to three times the number we had a few weeks ago," Senior Border Patrol Agent Shawn Moran told HUMAN EVENTS. Moran is spokesman for the local San Diego chapter of the National Border Patrol Council, the patrolmen's union. "In one place, we have eight times," said Moran. Asked if this could just be a seasonal increase, Moran replied, "We usually get something of an increase at this time of year, but nothing like this." The trend showed no signs of abating, he said. Moran says he is certain Bush's plan is motivating the illegal aliens who have caused the spike in illegal border crossings. "Because 95% of the people we're catching say that's why," Moran said. "They say they're coming for the amnesty. A lot of these people have not been caught before. They have no immigration histories." Moran also said the Bush proposal has caused a change in the urgency and demography of illegal border crossers. "We're catching them repeatedly throughout the week," Moran said. "They're desperate to get this amnesty even though we told them it's only a proposal. . . . We're catching more women and children than we have since 1999." Bush's Amnesty Plan Triggers Jump in Illegal Immigration HUMAN EVENTS (FR link) - January 27, 2004 - Joseph A. D'Agostino
The aliens he proposes admitting must have an employer waiting for them in advance.
There is no limit to the number of Aliens the President would admit who have underbid American wages on any new job offered. Additionally, established immigrants could offer jobs that required fluency in a foreign language, as a ruse to open the floodgates of chain immigration. They will be registered with the government, and we will know where they are.
We know where they are now, and do nothing about it. We know how to find the million-plus Illegals currently using the matricula consular ID cards. We know where to find employees using false Social Security numbers. We know where the day-laborer sites are. We know where the hospital delivery rooms and emergency rooms are. Heck, we know where to find Illegals who've just lost their deportation hearings, right there in the courtroom, and then we let them go. Immigration will have the power to exclude, or deport, any one found here without the proper paperwork.
We have that power now, and fail to use it. The Wall Street Journal today is calling for a new policy that will register aliens and track them.
The Wall Street Journal's position on Illegals has long been for Amnesty, Open Borders, and Globalism.
|
397
posted on
01/27/2004 10:17:23 AM PST
by
Sabertooth
(Take the Reagan Amnesty Pop Quiz! - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1065553/posts)
To: onyx
Yeah ! Hey, you're getting to be a regular Pro at posting pics now, ma'am !!
398
posted on
01/27/2004 10:18:05 AM PST
by
MeekOneGOP
(Check out this HILARIOUS story !! haha!: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1060580/posts)
To: MJY1288
Congress spends money, Bush did not attach the pork to those bills, those wheeling and dealing Congress Critters did. Sure he signed them, but the Republicans in Congress agreed to the Pork to get enough votes for passage. Blame your Congressman and SenatorsExactly. Also many forget that a veto from the president can be overwritten by Congress so it becames law regardless
399
posted on
01/27/2004 10:19:05 AM PST
by
Kaslin
("The way to dishonor a fallen soldier is to quit too early." President George W. Bush)
To: redlipstick; TonyRo76; My2Cents; MeekOneGOP
I'm stealing this one for my profile page.
LOL, I would like to "borrow"them for my page as well. Will make great posters/fliers for the election season. Thanks.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380, 381-400, 401-420 ... 1,361-1,377 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson