To: ScreamingFist
Yes I have erad what the enquirer calls an "article". Sounds like she should be charged with extorsion as well. Or maybe she should be charged with "tabloid shopping" since this wasn't the first time she'd tried to sell this trope to a tabloid.
My ex-wife had a problem with ephedra. She took up to 2 1/2 bottles a DAY at times. Should I go to the DA in my hometown and demand he prosecute the owners or managers of the stores or say that my ex should be charged with "7-11 Shopping"? Becasue she went to so many different stores to buy the piss that gave her her fix?
Oh wait you say...ephedra was legal at the time and could be bought over the counter.
As far as we know, all of Rush's scripts were legal. He did nothing wrong in taking legally aquired prescriptions to the pharmacy to be filled.
And since when does ANYTHING written in the Enquirer constitute either ethical journalism or something admissible in a court of law?
97 posted on
01/27/2004 7:07:09 AM PST by
txradioguy
(This Tagline Sponsored By The U.S. Army)
To: txradioguy
"And since when does ANYTHING written in the Enquirer constitute either ethical journalism or something admissible in a court of law?"
Apparently there was enough "grit" in the Enquirer to have Rush take the charges seriously. And as far as professional jounalism goes, I'd take the Enquirer over the NY Times any day of the week.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson