Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: txradioguy
You're a radio guy. You know what signal to noise ratio is. You know that the discriminator circuitry is different for channels with high Q than low Q.

Understand ... the Enquirer is read by people who understand what the usual signal to noise ratio is in it. And so is the New York Times. One low Q the other high Q. The readership's discriminator functions have been established.

Now. If a person wants to get a false signal through, which is the better channel?

125 posted on 01/27/2004 8:17:57 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]


To: bvw
"The readership's discriminator functions have been established."

Actually, I would think a comparison to filters rather than dicriminators would be more appropriate. The NY Times uses some serious band pass filtering, while the Enquirer uses low pass filtering.
181 posted on 01/27/2004 1:07:44 PM PST by ScreamingFist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson