Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JasonC
*ding* *ding* *DING*! We have a winner!

You, sir, have asked the $64,000 question. And the answer is "the Clintons".
12 posted on 01/26/2004 10:08:47 PM PST by FreedomPoster (This space intentionally blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: FreedomPoster
I wish. It goes rather deeper than that. Partisan politics as answer to every concern is a little too shallow for the real world. Careerism, ticket punching, officers as mere pols and spinners - these things are a little too common and run a little too deep to all be Clinton's fault. Officer careers are too long to be determined by one president.

Clark got on the "political officer" track in the 1970s, under Ford, when he went from west point poli sci academic to the OMB. He spent a long time getting from major to colonel, finally ending up in training commands. He ran the NTC under Bush the elder, which is the position he became a general to fill. After three years doing that he got command of the US 1st cav - after gulf war I. Which was being switched from a heavy army main force. He stayed there under Clinton. His Clinton era specifically political role started with Dayton (negotiating with the Serbs), and then southern command and Panama (pulling out), finally Kosovo.

What did all of these various institutions and superiors get out of him? Why did none of them ever sidetrack him? Is political brownosing still the way ahead in our armed forces? It would be naive to think there aren't a dozen others like him still serving...

18 posted on 01/27/2004 12:53:00 AM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson