1 posted on
01/26/2004 9:05:18 PM PST by
Pokey78
To: Howlin; Miss Marple; mombonn; Sabertooth; beckett; BlueAngel; JohnHuang2; *Peggy Noonan list; ...
Peggy ping!
2 posted on
01/26/2004 9:06:11 PM PST by
Pokey78
(Steyn: Leftists demonize Wolfowitz because his name begins with a big scary animal and ends Jewishly)
To: Pokey78
All of this was captured by Camille Paglia last summer, in an interview with Salon that at the time struck me as extreme and now seems prescient. Asked what she, as a pro-military Democrat, thinks of the retired general, she said: "What a phony! . . . Clark reminds me of Keir Dullea in '2001: A Space Odyssey'--a blank, vacant expression, detached and affectless."
Weasley - a phony for sure..............and soon everyone will know it, and then Wesley will end up in a rubber room within a decade. As the play plays on.
4 posted on
01/26/2004 9:21:54 PM PST by
thesummerwind
(Like painted kites, those days and nights, they went flyin' by)
To: Pokey78
Clark will flame out just like dean. You just can't fool all the people all the time. In the end it has to be kerry by default. Even the dims will figure that out and then Pres Bush will spank him badly because kerry is a poser too.
5 posted on
01/26/2004 9:36:01 PM PST by
paul51
To: Pokey78
Yes he's creepy, but this time Noonan didn't make the case.
And I like my generals a bit more sober than Grant.
To: Pokey78
To: Pokey78
Now the wonderful Peggy needs to tune in to how bad Edwards is. Among the big media folks, I bet she'll be one of the first.
To: Pokey78
It is all true, but everyone is so focused on presidential politics they miss the real story it reveals. Our military in the 1990s promoted this kind of guy to the head of Nato. Something diseased happened to the upper reaches of the American officer corps, that this character wasn't passed over at colonel until he retired. What was it, and why did it happen? And is any of it still going on?
11 posted on
01/26/2004 9:59:16 PM PST by
JasonC
To: Pokey78
Democrats, for the good of the country: Stop Wesley Clark! What gives Peggy Noonan the idea dumbocrats give a damn about the country??
To: Pokey78
. . . based on serious conversations the past few months with Republicans and also normal people: . . . I love that line. Pretty good read, Peggy.
___________
Wesley:
Hillary's
Girlie Boy!
To: Howlin; Southflanknorthpawsis; Scenic Sounds
There may be something to the idea that Democrats in general want to get rid of George W. Bush more than Republicans in general want to keep him. One could certainly reach that conclusion from reading this site.
24 posted on
01/27/2004 3:16:56 AM PST by
Amelia
To: Pokey78
A mind is a terrible thing to Wes.
29 posted on
01/27/2004 6:02:25 AM PST by
OESY
To: Pokey78
I've encountered many a Clark supporter, both in cyberspace and in surround.
You could practically infer the man by his glassy-eyed devotees. They spout what they have been told are his beliefs, cite his mesmerizing resume, and you know at once that they've found what they really want---an authority figure. And some adore merely the figure. Puppets worship puppeteers---and statues.
To: Pokey78
Clark has stopped himself - he's done.
33 posted on
01/27/2004 6:26:20 AM PST by
petercooper
(We did not have to prove Saddam had WMD, he had to prove he didn't.)
To: Pokey78
Gen. Clark gives off the vibrations of a man who has no real beliefs save one: Wes Clark should be president.The democratic party mirrors the General's void of ideology, they are about power and power alone. Clinton was able to DUPE the voters into believing that he shared their ideology, but I don't see any of these candidates as possessed of that magnitude of talent to deceive, and deceive is what they must do.
To: Pokey78
Dean, Clark and Larouche. It's so easy to group those three in a similar subset.
51 posted on
01/27/2004 10:59:43 AM PST by
.cnI redruM
(Texas; more churches than any other state in the US!)
To: Explorer89
Noonan ping.
To: Pokey78
All of Noonan's criticisms are valid and important.
"What a phony! . . . Clark reminds me of Keir Dullea in '2001: A Space Odyssey'--a blank, vacant expression, detached and affectless."
Wow! Paglia may be a nut, but she got that one right.
56 posted on
01/28/2004 11:01:54 AM PST by
Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson