To: RS
In lawyer ethics speak it meant the safest most ethical course of action was to ask the judge. period. To do otherwise risks an ethical violation.
When it comes to ethics, it all mandates the most conservative course of action. The attorneys who review such ethics situations make probable cause findings based on such opinions. He had a clear enough answer from the ethics hotline. This elected public official did not do that. An attorney on a review committee is not going to be so lenient.
To: longtermmemmory
An attorney on a review committee is not going to be so lenient.
Oh please! Those review committees are as liberal and stocked full of political people as the Florida supreme court. Its naive to think they'll be anything BUT against Rush's position in this matter.
251 posted on
01/27/2004 9:17:38 AM PST by
ClintonBeGone
(Sell crazy someplace else, we're all stocked up here. a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com" target="_)
To: longtermmemmory
I would think you would need a ruling that says that the (non-?) plea bargain info should not have been released before you go after someones ethics in releasing it...
Otherwise the point appears to be moot.
So Blacks next step should be sueing regarding the release, correct ?
263 posted on
01/27/2004 10:31:32 AM PST by
RS
(Just because they're out to get him doesn't mean he's not guilty)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson