Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: eastforker
Realy, so if the President said go, the man in the silo could refuse, even though his partner is armed and may have a differant outlook?

Disclaimer: although I know a bunch of former missileers, I am not, nor have ever been one myself.

The way I see it, anyway, a nation's ability to wage war of any sort depends on the willingness of the guys on the pointy end to wage it.

That would be as true in a silo, as on the front lines.

The difference, I think, would be the type of pressure one is under when the time comes. In the case of the guy in the silo, the supposition is that he can overcome the inherent revulsion of sending a missile off that will kill thousands or millions.

The military knows this, BTW, which is why they're pretty careful about who they'll allow to sit at the console. They want to make sure they've got people who, when given the launch order, will actually launch.

46 posted on 01/26/2004 2:26:51 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: r9etb
I have read that there is quite a turnover of silo personnel for that exact reason.
54 posted on 01/26/2004 2:30:58 PM PST by eastforker (The color of justice is green,just ask Johny Cochran!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: r9etb
As an aside, I wonder how many of the missiles would actually work.
61 posted on 01/26/2004 2:35:02 PM PST by jerseygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson