To: Modernman
I am not opposed to tightening up the language. Hopefully they will do so.
But, I don't like some judge acting all superior.
The fact is, rarely do these fears about laws come true. There may be vague language at the time, but the spirit of the law means a lot. Just because they technically "could" do something because of vague language doesn't mean they would or even try to do so.
82 posted on
01/26/2004 1:21:47 PM PST by
rwfromkansas
("Men stumble over the truth, but most pick themselves up as if nothing had happened." Churchill)
To: rwfromkansas
The fact is, rarely do these fears about laws come true. Right. And "rarely" does an innocent man go down death row.
It's not even worth considering -- unless you're that innocent man. Or, someone concerned with the incremental march toward absolute statism.
126 posted on
01/26/2004 6:10:27 PM PST by
Don Joe
To: rwfromkansas
Just because they technically "could" do something because of vague language doesn't mean they would or even try to do so. So, you trust government never to abuse its power? Even if, say, Hillary Clinton was president?
155 posted on
01/26/2004 7:12:17 PM PST by
Modernman
("The details of my life are quite inconsequential...." - Dr. Evil)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson