[JohnnyZ]

Upshot: you can help terrorists all you want to, tell them how to make chemical weapons, advise them which targets they should bomb, etc, etc.

[Don Joe]

Upshot: you can help terrorists all you want to, tell them how to make chemical weapons, advise them which targets they should bomb, etc, etc.

Well, no. Try this:

Upshot: you can no longer be prosecuted for saying, "Fries with that, sir?" when it's Abdulla talking into the happy clown face at the drive-through, or saying, "Here's the change for your fill-up" at the gas station, or saying, "That'll be eleven fifty two for your groceries, m'am."

I believe it's already illegal to give aid and comfort to the enemy. This law, as it reads, would appear to give a free pass to go after anyone who's engaged in even the most casual of transactions. They could probably even go after the State of New York for accepting toll fees from Moustafa if he drives over the Tappan Zee Bridge.

[oceanview]

exactly right. they will have to appeal this, or tighten up the law.

the judiciary is the most corrupt branch of government we have, accountable to no onw, often with lifetime appointment. to entrust any aspect of the war on terror to them, is to surrender. the left owns the judiciary.