You want him to follow you and others like you, not lead.
I can see that you are not interested in arguing, but rather contradicting. Your original argument was that he compromising with the governed, i.e. that his ideals are in line in conservatives, but were compromised to meet those of the general populace. Now you have changed your argument to suggest that his ideals are not in line with conservatives and he is not compromising, but rather leading. I'm not going to waste my time responding to contradictions.