Regards THIS thread and my contentions,whether it was merited or not IS beside the point.
My point is that from my observations Freepers seem rabidly anti Kennedy,and I think it redirects the discussions and takes focus off of the facts in the articles and leads the discussion away from the issues posed by the article.
I do think comparing Clinton's brother and brothers-in-law is more related.
In this particluar case, for this thread, it is related. Comparing the kennedy clan, that is. The professor quoted in the article behind this thread talked about the bushes and their connections. Well, what dem family has had and used and enjoyed connections way before the Bush brothers did? So I beg to differ with your observation.