Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CA: Spending cap absolutely crucial
OC Register ^ | 1/26/04 | Lewis K. Uhler

Posted on 01/26/2004 9:20:11 AM PST by NormsRevenge

Edited on 04/14/2004 10:06:37 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Gov. Schwarzenegger and his team have done yeoman's work on the budget. But in simply trying to slow the growth of spending, they have been caught in the "liberal flack" budget trap. Has anybody else noticed how much of every newscast is devoted to stories of the "taking wheelchairs from invalids" variety? In his effort to merely halt spending increases, not actually cut spending, the governor is tarred as Simon Legree.


(Excerpt) Read more at 2.ocregister.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: bonds; calgov2002; california; crucial; freeze; gann; prop57; prop58; spendingcap
Lewis K. Uhler, President of the National Tax Limitation Committee, headquartered in the Sacramento area, was one of the co-authors of California's original Gann Limit (Prop. 4) and advises nationally on tax and expenditure limits.
1 posted on 01/26/2004 9:20:16 AM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *calgov2002
FReeze the spending, Gub. Please!
2 posted on 01/26/2004 9:21:00 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi Mac ...... /~normsrevenge - FoR California Propositions/Initiatives info...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Agreed. Cutting the required legislative majority to pass a budget from 2/3 to 55% is also a terrible mistake.
3 posted on 01/26/2004 9:35:17 AM PST by labard1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
We need a REAL spending cap, not merely a reform of our budgetary process. We need to keep spending in check, not merely ensure the budget is balanced on time. Our aim should be to permanently shrink the size of state government, not balance the budget on the backs of the next generation or ensure it gets on-going revenues to expand entitlement programs.
4 posted on 01/26/2004 10:52:08 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
It is a special time in California politics and it will be interesting to see where the process is next year at this time. I am glad this election is in March and not June...
5 posted on 01/26/2004 1:35:29 PM PST by tubebender (Don't believe anything you hear and only half of what you see...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Local opposition to prop 56...

1/26/04 Local Groups Join No On Prop 56 Campaign by Christine Bensen The Eureka Reporter Friday the Humboldt County Taxpayers League and the Humboldt County Farm Bureau joined hundreds of other groups and organizations in endorsing the No on Proposition 56 campaign. Leo Sears, vice president of the Humboldt County Taxpayers League, and Gene Senetraro, Humboldt County Farm Bureau board member, joined Al Lundeen, communications director for Californians Against Higher Taxes -- No on 56, at a news conference. Currently, the state Constitution requires a two-thirds’ vote of each house of the Legislature for the passage of bills that increase taxes. Among other things, this measure would reduce the number of votes needed to pass tax-increase measures from two-thirds to 55 percent. Lundeen said his group is against Proposition 56 because it knows the real aim of the proposition would be to make it easier to raise taxes. Senetraro said land-tax increases are making it more difficult for local people in the agriculture business to compete on a statewide and national level. He said land tax is one of the highest costs for local agriculturalists. “Yes, we need reform,” Lundeen said, “(but,) 56 does not deliver comprehensive reform.” He said as far as his group is concerned, approving Proposition 56 would be like handing legislators a “blank check.” For more information about Californians Against Higher Taxes -- No on 56, visit www.NoBlankChecks.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------   Front Page News Arts & Entertainment Community Opinions Sports Youth & Education About Us Ask Us...        

6 posted on 01/26/2004 1:41:35 PM PST by tubebender (Don't believe anything you hear and only half of what you see...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson