[areafiftyone]

Yea I want to know the reason why too. I am going to give him the benfit of the doubt since the media has decided to bash Dean at every convenience. Not that I am a Dean fan but I don't trust the media because they have chosen Dean as the candidate to make fun of.

[Peach]

It's safe to say none of us are Dean supporters on this thread, but this story just does not make sense, as you and many freepers have noted.

[newzhawk]

The media has now turned on Dean fearing he may lose it for them- they dogged Clinton until they thought he may win - then loved and supported him- it is possible he was concerned about her- but just the way he refers to her to a staff person is strange- why not "Could you please take care of my wife before the crowds get too much?" He is a strange one!

[steve50]

Not that I am a Dean fan but I don't trust the media because they have chosen Dean as the candidate to make fun of.

It's almost like the media has an interest in making sure it's a Bush/Kerry election. On second thought forget the almost. I can call the winner now, S&B.

[luckystarmom]

I don't agree with Dean politically, but the press sure is picking on stupid things. I didn't even think his "nuts" speech was over the top. I also thought Diane Sawyer was just nasty in her interview with the Dean's. Sawyer picked on Judy Dean not using her husband's name professionally. Judy Dean said nicely, at home I'm just Judy Dean. Professionally, I'm Dr. ??? (I can't remember her name). Lots of women in professions keep their maiden names because of the recognition. It's not a big deal.

Sawyer complained that Judy Dean doesn't campaign like Hillary Clinton. Who cares. Judy Dean comes off much better than Hitlery.