To: DMCA
Then you believe women should have no say in that? Their desire to be combat pilots or what-have-you has no weight?
83 posted on
01/25/2004 10:28:45 AM PST by
TigersEye
(Democrat - the abortion party - euthanasia party - disarmament party .............)
To: TigersEye
If they pass the EXACT SAME standards as men then yes. But to do not have to so that point is null and void.
120 posted on
01/25/2004 12:44:09 PM PST by
DMCA
(TITLE 17 Chapter 1 Sec 107)
To: TigersEye
Their desire to be combat pilots or what-have-you has no weight? Absolutely correct. NO WEIGHT whatsoever. It is only the feminist/careerist types who want the combat roles because they perceive that they cannot advance the same as male combat vets into certain command billets. That they should not HAVE such billets is beside the point to them. And the enlisted women, for the most part, are not thrilled with the idea that THEY get to pay the price for the ambitions of a few officers.
121 posted on
01/25/2004 1:12:31 PM PST by
dcwusmc
("The most dangerous man, to any government, is the man who is able to think things out for himself.)
To: TigersEye
Their desire to be combat pilots or what-have-you has no weight? Absolutely correct. NO WEIGHT whatsoever. It is only the feminist/careerist types who want the combat roles because they perceive that they cannot advance the same as male combat vets into certain command billets. That they should not HAVE such billets is beside the point to them. And the enlisted women, for the most part, are not thrilled with the idea that THEY get to pay the price for the ambitions of a few officers.
None of which excuses rape, by any stretch of anyone's imagination, needless to say... my point was your post.
122 posted on
01/25/2004 1:13:42 PM PST by
dcwusmc
("The most dangerous man, to any government, is the man who is able to think things out for himself.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson