To: JohnGalt
The women, ranging from enlisted soldiers to officers...I find it hard to believe that an officer's charges of rape would be ignored.
6 posted on
01/25/2004 9:19:49 AM PST by
metesky
("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
To: metesky
I hope these are actually being investigated. Given the destructive nature of the mere charge, it would not be difficult for a woman to lie for advantage or revenge. Soldiers should be worrying about the enemy not women soldiers.
Does the military have rape kits to collect evidence?
Even so, consentual sex can easily be called rape after the fact.
This does not doubt this crime is happening. However, just ONE false claim and all the legitimate claims are minimized.
To: metesky; JohnGalt
The women, ranging from enlisted soldiers to officers... Wouldn't an OFFICER have the attacker arrested forthwith? (Unless perhaps he was a higher ranking officer?)
And, out of thousands and thousands of consensual acts of intimacy that are taking place between female and male soldiers, would it not be logical that there would be 30 women who would cry rape afterwards (perhaps the same rate as among civilians?)
62 posted on
01/25/2004 10:09:24 AM PST by
gg188
To: metesky
If the rape was by another officer it would be.
116 posted on
01/25/2004 12:11:37 PM PST by
cynicom
To: metesky
"I find it hard to believe that an officer's charges of rape would be ignored."Absolutely.
This smells of *agenda*.
...to high Heaven.
118 posted on
01/25/2004 12:13:55 PM PST by
Landru
(Tagline Schmagline...)
To: metesky
I know a woman who was a Coaast Guard officer, and she confirms that even women officers are victims.
200 posted on
01/26/2004 8:44:07 PM PST by
connectthedots
(John Calvin WAS NOT a Calvinist.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson