[sauropod]

"The Radcliffs can receive about $60,000 from the sale of their house after paying off the homeowners association and a lien for past-due income taxes. All expect the home's current owner to demand much more than the $70,000 he paid for the house to sell it back to the Rad-cliffs."

"I doubt if that would be a viable option. He's going to look for profit," said Don Morger, the senior vice president of Coast Assessment Service."

"The new owner could not be reached for comment."

The new owner is a prick. He should be sued also. Bet he's a 'Rat.

[Lazamataz]

The new owner is a prick. He should be sued also. Bet he's a 'Rat.

Sued. And sued. And sued. Then contact the press. And contact them. And contact them. Take out paid advertising. Erect websites. Start a cause.

What happens at CPAC stays at CPAC.

The first rule of Fight Club, is nobody talks about Fight Club.

[daviddennis]

Perhaps he just wants his money back, which is reasonable enough?

I'm wondering how $120 became almost $2,000 in less than a year. For $2,000 in charges couldn't someone have called these people and told them they needed to pay their fees and lose the home?

I'm sure that if someone had walked up to their house and explained the situation, the couple would have found a way to get the $120.

It's not the buyer's fault, it's the association's, and I think the association should be liable for a loss that's looking pretty grim if the house was worth $250k.

D