Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Couple lose their home over $120 debt
The Sacramento Bee ^ | January 24, 2004 | Michael Kolber -- Bee Staff Writer

Posted on 01/25/2004 5:49:41 AM PST by DelaWhere

Edited on 04/12/2004 6:04:31 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 381-399 next last
To: thinking
yea, just stop paying your property taxes

I live in the country (ok, it's really a swamp!). I don't pay property tax (yet). Too poor.

81 posted on 01/25/2004 6:45:56 AM PST by Pern ("It's good to know who hates you, and it's good to be hated by the right people." - Johnny Cash, RIP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: alrea
This is much like annexation. Cities just annex and send the PROPERTY OWNER a bill for thousands of dollars.

Even worse is the use of condemnation via Eminent Domain laws for the building of shopping malls by a politicians buddy.

82 posted on 01/25/2004 6:46:00 AM PST by Lazamataz (The Republicans have turned into Democrats, and the Democrats have turned into Marxists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: buffyt
She told me the other day that her HOA doesn't allow campaign signs in the front yard in her neighborhood!

There is Supreme Court ruling that disagrees with that restriction. It was brought by an Anti-Gulf War I protester, who won at the USSC.

I had a go-around with my HOA a few years back and did some research, which I'd be glad to share with anyone who freep mails me. I put up political signs whenever I wanted to. My HOA backed down.

83 posted on 01/25/2004 6:46:00 AM PST by Balding_Eagle (REAL men aren't Liberals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DelaWhere
I once sent my HOA an email, asking why there was a double-standard. They made me paint my home over reported 'fading' but my neighbor's rotting trim, and pealing paint was ok with them.

"Please Do Not Leave Trash Containers Outside for More Than 2 Days After Trash Pickup!" ...or else was their reply.

84 posted on 01/25/2004 6:46:12 AM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
So what's the higher authority, the first amendment, or the bylaws?

This has been a discussion before. Here’s one way to look at it: If your agree not to put a sign in your yard (by agreeing to the bylaws) you gave up that particular part of the 1st Amendment.

85 posted on 01/25/2004 6:46:47 AM PST by TankerKC (My life is a Country Song.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Certainly you aren't defending a foreclosure for a mere $120.00?It isn't so much the money as it is the party who performed the foreclosure. If they defaulted on a loan, okay. They didn't own it. But the HOA? Please.
86 posted on 01/25/2004 6:46:50 AM PST by ovrtaxt (Sick of big government Republicans, but you have nowhere to go? Visit www.rlc.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: wimpycat
THere is not enough information in the 2 articles posted through my google search to suggest that the HOA did forclose with no notice other then the Radcliffs take on the situation.
87 posted on 01/25/2004 6:47:13 AM PST by alisasny (Thankyou to all who made 12/28 party so wonderful in NYC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Ronly Bonly Jones
That's assuming you can find a place without an HOA.

Around here, ALL new construction developments come with HOAs. . .
88 posted on 01/25/2004 6:47:19 AM PST by Salgak (don't mind me: the orbital mind control lasers are making me write this. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Even worse is the use of condemnation via Eminent Domain laws for the building of shopping malls by a politicians buddy

You've been listening to Boortz too, I take it?

89 posted on 01/25/2004 6:47:58 AM PST by ovrtaxt (Sick of big government Republicans, but you have nowhere to go? Visit www.rlc.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: DelaWhere
I wish you well in your efforts to Freep these creeps, but it's probably a lost cause. I think the best course of action would be to help the legislator who is working on a bill to prevent HOAs from doing this kind of thing. The HOAs need to be knocked down about five or six notches. They are too powerful in most places.

The other moral is never to buy a home in a subdivision with an HOA. The people who are enthusiastic for HOAs are the kind who have no respect for property rights. If they wanted group control over everyone else's property, they should form a co-op to own the property and just have everyone rent from the co-op. That scheme would be honest. Pretending that the individuals own their houses when in reality all decisions are made by the HOA is dishonest.

WFTR
Bill

90 posted on 01/25/2004 6:48:03 AM PST by WFTR (Liberty isn't for cowards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
But the courts uphold entities and their rules over the individual's right to property. Am I off base here? Seems to me the right to life, liberty and property trumps EVERYTHING else.

Your natural rights life, liberty, and property only exist if others agree to respect them.

This means you have to respect the rights of others.

This means a system of trust has to be in place.

If you enter into an agreement with a HOA or anything else, you have to be trusted to keep your word.

Other wise the system of trust falls apart.

When the system of trust falls apart so does the respect for your natural rights.

Remember "Natural Rights" do not exist in nature, animals steal from each other all the time!

Natural Rights are merely a concept in our heads!

91 posted on 01/25/2004 6:48:37 AM PST by Mark was here (My fan club: "Go abuse some family member, as I'm sure is your practice." - Principled)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: alisasny
No, just stating now that there is more to this story then 120 bucks....

I read in the article about a lien based on an income tax debt, but they don't foreclose houses (usually) for such a thing, and the IRS is not mentioned as the foreclosing party. This is just one of those typical liens put on property for failure to pay a debt. Mechanics liens, Tax liens, ... why, I've even heard of private home-health-aide debts going against a property as a lien.

(My brief and old temporary career as an abstractor is coming in handy....)

92 posted on 01/25/2004 6:48:57 AM PST by Lazamataz (The Republicans have turned into Democrats, and the Democrats have turned into Marxists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
What "should" be and what "is" are two very different things.

When a property has a Covenant on it, you have two choices: sign, or don't buy. . .
93 posted on 01/25/2004 6:49:40 AM PST by Salgak (don't mind me: the orbital mind control lasers are making me write this. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
"Of course, by then, I'll be all old and stuff so I'll be an easy target. :o)"

Not necessarily unless you insist on the painted bullseye on your forehead and a "come get me" sign on your walker. lol

94 posted on 01/25/2004 6:49:54 AM PST by verity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
You've been listening to Boortz too, I take it?

I cannot stand Boortz. I'm a Glenn Beck guy. :o)

No, I've read about these abuses on FR.

95 posted on 01/25/2004 6:50:04 AM PST by Lazamataz (The Republicans have turned into Democrats, and the Democrats have turned into Marxists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: KC Burke
Instead of liens and all that, wouldn't it make more sense if HOA's found a way to strap themselves into a mortgage ala escrow accounts that pay taxes? We've always done escrow on our mortgages so we never had to worry about propterty tax bills. Sometimes when things get rough, it just becomes very difficult to sit down and do the bills.
Something like this happened similar to me recently when I dealt with depression and early pregnancy(no, no notices or foreclosures or anything, but some of the bills did stack up and that isn't like me to neglect that stuff). I finally took the time to put everything on bill pay and it has been wonderful. I can now just check it once a week or so and make sure everything is going through as planned. So if life throws a curve ball now, things continue to get paid.
These folks are in their 60's, I'm guessing the partner that was not sick did not usually handle the bills and neither one were aware of or trusted using a billpay system. Some folks really don't even know that you can get an accountant or financial advisor to handle your bills as well. I've met a lot of folks green on stuff like this and it usually takes getting burnt once or twice before you realize there is help. Not to mention it takes admitting that you need the assistance to begin with.
96 posted on 01/25/2004 6:51:07 AM PST by cupcakes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: alisasny
Assuming of course that the couple shared their financial misgivings with their children. Some folks don't.
97 posted on 01/25/2004 6:52:49 AM PST by cupcakes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz; All
I dig Beck too. I switch back and forth usually.

Well, now that I've got everyone all upset about property rights, I'm gonna go to church and plot the Zionist takeover of the planet. ;)
98 posted on 01/25/2004 6:53:04 AM PST by ovrtaxt (Sick of big government Republicans, but you have nowhere to go? Visit www.rlc.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
You need a lesson in real estate law. When this land in this subdivision was divided into plots BY ITS OWNER, a deed restriction was also placed on all of the land by ITS OWNER. The land was then sold to others SUBJECT TO THE RESTRICTION, with each purchaser saying in writing that he or she read all the rules in the deed restriction and wholeheartedly agrees to them. The restrictions protect the property owners from one another doing anything against the deed restriction -- like building a rendering plant, or playing their new Bose stereo in the back yard at top volume at 2 AM, or erecting a 500 foot satellite dish.

Associations are legally required to enforce the rules. Associations also often keep the streets cleared of snow, maintain the community swimming pool and tennis courts, and provide other valuable services. These services cost money, and $120 a year is pretty cheap.

Bottom line: these homeowners agreed to lose their home if they did not pay their dues. They have nothing to b*tch about.

99 posted on 01/25/2004 6:53:37 AM PST by PackerBoy (Just my opinion ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
I'm gonna go to church and plot the Zionist takeover of the planet. ;)

Synagogue.

Synagogue.

100 posted on 01/25/2004 6:54:36 AM PST by Lazamataz (The Republicans have turned into Democrats, and the Democrats have turned into Marxists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 381-399 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson