To: neverdem
Nope sounds like he is reporting the facts, which makes me wonder if he is actually writing for the NY times.
3 posted on
01/24/2004 8:25:19 PM PST by
dts32041
("Taxes are not levied for the benefit of the taxed" RAH)
To: dts32041
I didn't think anyone was questioning this. I thought it was pretty clear in 2000 he was center-right. Much of his liberal social agenda was actually promised in his 2000 campaign. The question of late has been is GWB so liberal that conservatives shouldn't vote for him. And the answer is no. We're stuck with GWB's liberal social agenda because he will be the best viable choice come November.
64 posted on
01/25/2004 8:51:57 AM PST by
Huck
(Was that offensive? I hope that wasn't offensive.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson