Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem
Nope sounds like he is reporting the facts, which makes me wonder if he is actually writing for the NY times.
3 posted on 01/24/2004 8:25:19 PM PST by dts32041 ("Taxes are not levied for the benefit of the taxed" RAH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: dts32041
I didn't think anyone was questioning this. I thought it was pretty clear in 2000 he was center-right. Much of his liberal social agenda was actually promised in his 2000 campaign. The question of late has been is GWB so liberal that conservatives shouldn't vote for him. And the answer is no. We're stuck with GWB's liberal social agenda because he will be the best viable choice come November.
64 posted on 01/25/2004 8:51:57 AM PST by Huck (Was that offensive? I hope that wasn't offensive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson