Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RiflemanSharpe
Well... it's not amnesty. I know it gets portrayed as amnesty...but it's not. But, if you believe that it is amnesty... then even if I paste the plan on the thread, I doubt I could change your mind.

Spending has been significantly reduced since the 2001 Budget submitted by Bill Clinton. Even though spending has increased for military, intelligence, and homeland security, discretionary spending has actually decreased - considerably.

As for the deficit... wow! I don't know where to begin. But I don't think there is a candidate alive who is going to please you there.

261 posted on 01/26/2004 9:16:06 AM PST by carton253 (The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States and war is what they got!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies ]


To: carton253
Then we will agree to disagree. I like a candidate who is fiscally reasonable. I was willing to put up with borrow and spend after 9/11 because of the crisis this country was in. But after the pill bill I said enough is enough. Not another blotted federal entitlement to saddle future generations with paying for. Weh ave to lower the amount of spending.
262 posted on 01/26/2004 9:20:48 AM PST by RiflemanSharpe (An American for a more socially and fiscally conservation America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson