Silence of the blogs

Salon.com ^ | Jan. 23, 2004 | Salon.com

[Print]

Why did the New York Times ignore Baghdad blogger announcements and accounts of a big pro-democracy demonstration?

Article HERE

[Print]

"A great day for Iraq" blog report HERE

[Diogenesis]

Because they support the enemies of the USA
and are solely interested in foistering homosexuality on America
through the NewYorkTimes-Lewis-Massachusetts Court connection.

[chiller]

Why did the New York Times ignore Baghdad blogger announcements and accounts of a big pro-democracy demonstration?

A rhetorical question, I trust.

[Drango]

Why drive traffic to Salon?

[Print]

Photo report 1 HERE

Photo report 2 HERE

Photo report 3 HERE

[John Jorsett]

What's the point of posting an article I can't read without subscribing to Salon (and that ain't gonna happen)?

[Print]

Why drive traffic to Salon?

It's not about Salon. It's about the news that even Salon couldn't avoid to report.

[Always Right]

Because they support the enemies of the USA and are solely interested in foistering homosexuality on America through the NewYorkTimes-Lewis-Massachusetts Court connection.

Sorry, but that's not quite true. They are also interested in having the US surrender its sovereignty to the UN through stupid treaties such as Kyoto.

[cripplecreek]

very simple. agenda agenda agenda.

[McGavin999]

Most of us here already read the Iraqi bloggers each day. They are wonderfully informative and the bloggers give us much hope for the future of Iraq.

Don't expect anyone in our media to report about them, because they don't want the American people to know how good it's going over there and they certainly don't want anyone to know that the Iraqi people actually want democracy.

[Diogenesis]

You are right.

solely =======> solely