To: InvisibleChurch
Professor wants all to read one Bible
Navarre
2 posted on
01/24/2004 6:10:08 AM PST by
cpforlife.org
(The Missing Key of the Pro-Life Movement is at www.CpForLife.org)
To: cpforlife.org
I, for one, think God can bring the true word out of a little competition. Jesus never had any problem with other so-called "prophets" competing against Him, because He knew His message was the right one.
The more translations, the better.
3 posted on
01/24/2004 6:15:11 AM PST by
LS
(CNN is the Amtrack of news.)
To: cpforlife.org
The ESV is a very good word for word translation, versus a dynamic equivalent or a paraphrase. We are using it in our church. BUT, the "one Bible for all" smacks of the legalism of the King James only group. Most people I associate with are utilizing several translations for their personal study. I regularly refer to 7. (English Standard Version, King James Version, New King James Version, New International Version, New Living Translation, Amplified Bible and The Message)
I disagree totally with Professor Jacobs determination to make it the "exclusive" English one size fits all Bible
6 posted on
01/24/2004 6:21:29 AM PST by
Knute
To: cpforlife.org
The Navarre is great! I have a few of the Gospels, but need to buy the rest. Not very portable, though :-) I have the New Jerusalem Bible too, it has very traditional language. I bought it from EWTN.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson