Replies

Point taken Matchett - and you were right to point out my error, but I must defend myself in that I meant no insult to Matt Drudge and his website. I merely found it odd that he would blithely link to an FR thread as if it were an article.

I have never seen him do this before, and perhaps he does it all the time - I am an ignorant sod as you have pointed out. I rarely read Drudge's website. It was a complete shock to me so early in the morning to find myself in the middle of FreeRepublic when I was certain I had searched DrudgeReport. One of those "now why did I do that?" moments for me.

I had searched FreeRepublic moments before looking for the article on Cherie Blair's critique of our President and having found none in FreeRepublic because no doubt I phrased my Search improperly, I then went to Drudge.
Thankfully Mr. Drudge had already found a thread on this website and guided me carefully to it.

My apologies to Mr. Drudge if and when he ever nods in here.
I am humbled.

And Mr. Matchett-PI I hardly think you need to chastise so many members in a general group. If you have issues with posters, would it not be more adult to deal with them directly, not a one-size-fits-all rant!

"I am an ignorant sod as you have pointed out."

Putting words in my mouth, are you? I did not point out in Reply #213 that you are an "ignorant sod"

"And Mr. Matchett-PI I hardly think you need to chastise so many members in a general group. If you have issues with posters, would it not be more adult to deal with them directly, not a one-size-fits-all rant!"

I did deal with you directly. I addressed my comments directly to you. They can be found at reply #213 --- rather than at reply #229 that you link readers to.

Any good reason why you linked people away from my reply and onto an unrelated one, hummmmmm????