[demlosers]

[chance33_98]

There's my missing hubcap!

[Inyo-Mono]

Those railroad crossing signals are on the wrong side of the road!

[Leroy S. Mort]

Wesley Clark in his Time Machine.

[FreedomCalls]

I think that image is fake. The "UFO" has a faint rectangular white outline around it. The color of the sky around the "UFO" looks lighter than the rest of the background. And the pixels are larger near the "UFO" than in the rest of the picture. The are only 12 months in a year, and the date stamp shows this picture was taken on the first day of the 15th month in 2004 -- and yet it's only 1.23.2004 so far. It's very crude. Too many mistakes.

[Revolting cat!]

"Xing" is misspelled on the sign!

[Atticus]

[PokeyJoe]

posted to put Michael Moore at the top spot in Google.

see tag

[Lazarus Starr]

definate fake. I alter photos digitally all the time in order to remove blemishes and such. You can see the tale-tale indications of these in the photo including the tip of the craft where obviously a smoothing tool feathered it a bit.

-Laz

[SnuffaBolshevik]

How come the power lines aren't attached to the pole?

[sweetliberty]

Very large cowboy hat?

[Porterville]

Rozario??? Holly crap, that movie about Cheech in Australia wasn't too far fetched, hell I oughta head there.

[TBall]

Last week during the day I saw two objects in the sky that I have never seen before. Very slow high altitude glide not a jet.

[Quix]

Looks real enough to me.

[Revolting cat!]

Note the parachutes about to land just above the "CROSSING" sign!

[FreedomCalls]

Heck, there's not even any chemtrails coming out of it. Shouldn't it be spraying chemtrails? Or laser beams or something?

[Revolting cat!]

I can't decide what's funnier: the intentionally funny posts or the oh-so-sincere humourless (or humorless) explanations! Sincerity! If you can fake it, you've got it made!

[Beck_isright]

It's about time they came back to get their missing freak child:

[ALASKA]

".......it's only a model."

[Redcloak]

That's nothing. Check out this frame capture from the Baghdad-cam during the war...

[TigersEye]

Australian UFO Research Network director George Simpson said a digital photograph was not considered acceptable evidence of a flying saucer. "They cannot be verified. They are too easily manipulated on the computer and you don't have a negative."

Did anyone notice this? Coupled with the phasing out of film cameras the general population will become divested of the means to take photographic evidence. With increasing "photoshop" abilities no digital picture will ever be acceptable as true.