[longtermmemmory]

The maximum should be an issue of drug court intervention. It is only natural for the defense lawyer to find out the intent of the prosecutor.

I suspect the reason behind the letter from Roy Black was to put in writing what they were seeking. Judging from the consversation outlined in Roy's letter, the letter was encouraged from the SA. Encouraged as a means of being suckered. Roy Black should get the jury consultant Dimitrius to analyze the SA personalities.

Remember there are no charges. The deal of drug court would be a very reasonable deal. The defendant consents to the charge and jurisdiction of the court. There is no need of probably cause because you would have a confession.

I am still believing the notion that the cline immunity deal was dovetailed to the cline's releasing the story to the enquirirer. The SA intended the story to embarass Rush into an admission.

The SA has an ethics violation problem.

[RS]

"I am still believing the notion that the cline immunity deal was dovetailed to the cline's releasing the story to the enquirirer. The SA intended the story to embarass Rush into an admission."

So the still unverified immunity was given, and the SA office waited almost a year in the hopes that Rush would admit to something that he still has not admitted to yet... (buying drugs illegally from the clines )

... remember, the doctor-shoppping buying took place AFTER the Clines were no longer a source...

Naw... don't think that theory works....