Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SJackson
but if by professing her innocence she provided false information to the prospects of her company, she may well lose

That's it in a nutshell; and it was after the first charges against her were handed down; she opened her little chatty web site, decrying her innocence......which, to the SEC, meant she was manipulating the company, thus causing her stockholders to lose money!

At least that's what Neil Cavuto said.

Martha is so snobby, when she was offered the first deal, it just wasn't good enough for her, so she called one of her many friends at DOJ and tried to go over the NY AG's head for a better deal. She got the door slammed in her face.

Stupid Martha.

215 posted on 01/23/2004 6:44:53 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]


To: Howlin
Stupid indeed ! Martha is NOT that smart...she just knew how to get herself into the limelight and her name in print.
217 posted on 01/23/2004 6:49:16 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson