To: presidio9
bump
17 posted on
01/23/2004 12:59:25 PM PST by
Tribune7
(Vote Toomey April 27)
To: Tribune7
Martha Stewart is not a stock broker so she can't be guilty of security fraud. She was not an insider of the company that she sold the stock of. She refused to testify against Waksal, so the SEC has charged her with misleading or lying to investigators. Be careful the next time you listen to an analyst on TV or read the business section of the Wall Street Journal, you may be as guilty as Martha Stewart. If you act on the advice and buy or sell, don't dare deny that you took the advice or you will be a common criminal. This case is not going to fly. It doesn't deserve to.
45 posted on
01/23/2004 1:25:50 PM PST by
meenie
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson