Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: presidio9
bump
17 posted on 01/23/2004 12:59:25 PM PST by Tribune7 (Vote Toomey April 27)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tribune7
Martha Stewart is not a stock broker so she can't be guilty of security fraud. She was not an insider of the company that she sold the stock of. She refused to testify against Waksal, so the SEC has charged her with misleading or lying to investigators. Be careful the next time you listen to an analyst on TV or read the business section of the Wall Street Journal, you may be as guilty as Martha Stewart. If you act on the advice and buy or sell, don't dare deny that you took the advice or you will be a common criminal. This case is not going to fly. It doesn't deserve to.
45 posted on 01/23/2004 1:25:50 PM PST by meenie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson