America's war of ideas is exactly what we need

It is simply not fair that the Americans can have a Civil War and we can't. Like every other political junkie in the known world, I have been living with my satellite feed since the Iowa caucuses on Monday, and the next few months, well, I have a plan, which is to absorb as much American politics as I can. Canadian politics? Bore me later. I mean Belinda Stronach is, upon consideration, a fine and interesting thing. At least she doesn't look like she'd been buried and dug up again, like everyone else. But shouldn't she have started with senator? Oh right, she can't, because the Senate is filled with Jean Chretien's stooges and besides, no one out of there has said anything, in any even tiny way, useful or interesting ever. They just cost money.

Not fair, not fair, not fair. The Americans can have a war of ideas and we can't discuss anything. Because anything not out of the Bigger Government playbook is called right-wing extremism, and worse Christian, and thus demonized. Meanwhile, the sleepiest country in the world, which lives next door to the most vibrant country in the world, continues to tumble into the wormhole of complete irrelevance. Unluckily for us, the extraordinary American growth and innovation can float even our dozy economy, and we never have to grow up and behave like adults.

And on Tuesday, the State of the Union. You'd have to go back to the Greeks to find theatre like that. There was the scarlet-faced Ted Kennedy stuffed into his $2,500 suit, and the harridan Hillary, her selfish little ferret face looking punched and puffy, like the schoolyard bully she is. As every policy initiative slipped from their grasp, the Democratic side of the aisle, visibly shrank. It was bliss, bliss, bliss.

What do we have here? Crony capitalism, and every 50-year-old with a graduate degree still left in the country, running around under the big Ottawa money tree, hands grasping at a nice six-figure gov'mnt job with travel allowance, car, driver, and big entertainment budget. The highest form of Canadian accomplishment: to spend your 60s living high off waitresses in Kamloops, discussing impenetrable and useless things. Just as long as they are so boring that no one notices.

Meanwhile, in the States, everyone is talking ideas. What's working, what is not. Yes, it sounds vulgar and loud. And some of it is egregious. There are flagrant lies on the left and the right. A lot of it is bonkers. Most people in the entertainment left, for instance, firmly believe that Bush is part of some infernal conspiracy that aims to strip the planet of oil, and control its price forever. With the next breath, they charge he's so stupid, he can't find his feet. Some think the CIA planned 9/11 so that we would support Israel. The rhetoric is astonishing, even from the so-called sane. George Soros announced that "America under Bush is a danger to the world." Excuse me? Does he need lithium? Columbia professor Nicholas de Genova called for "a million Mogadishus." A Berkeley professor claims that the U.S. planned the Bali bombing. The entertainment elites specialize in using their soft power to insult their government whenever they get a microphone in their hands and don't have a script.

At least they're alive. Up here, with the exception of the Post, most of our press is so conciliatory and so boring, no one bothers to read or watch it. The CBC can continue with its hardline, socialist world view unchallenged, and no one really gives a damn because the showdown south is just so fine. What are their audience figures anyway? Bet they're in the tank.

What if we had a real press? One that was actually competitive, and free-thinking, not skewed by the need to suck up to bureaucrats and MPs? And be honest now, hundreds of millions of dollars can trigger extreme amounts of sucking up. If the press were free here, it would mean actual stories would be told, that you wouldn't have to force yourself to buy a Canadian magazine out of patriotism, you'd actually want to because, strange new concept, it was interesting.

It was a great shame for journalists all across the country, for instance, that the Bloc Quebecois, not our so-called media, had to break the story about the revolting 40% increase in federal government spending over the past five years. There was a 90% increase in the Justice Department budget, 129% in legal services alone. What on God's green earth would they be doing with that money?

Why don't we know more about the connection between the Desmarais family, TotalFinaElf, the Bank Paribas, Jacques Chirac, and the UN's Oil for Food program? Given the relationship between the Desmarais family and Chretien, did that have anything to do with our refusal to join the war in Iraq? If this were the States, that story would be front and centre for months. Why do we not know more about the $250,000 the Canadian government gave to Human Concern International, an Ottawa-based organization headed by Ahmed Khadr who is reputed to have links with Osama bin Laden. Khadr used the money to open refugee camps in Pakistan that CSIS now says were used to aid Islamic fighters waging holy war in Afghanistan.

Let me tell you why we don't have a free press. If we did, things would change for our plushy elites pretty fast. As economist Roger Cass observed in his December newsletter, the C-Wave, the free and vibrant discussion of ideas in the States has meant that the Democratic party is shrinking. From over 50% of registered voters identifying as Democrats in the late 70s, they now stand at 34%. Conversely, the number of registered Republicans has risen, from 20% in the late '70s to 33% today. Even-steven. A free and vital exchange of ideas. A close observation of government operations, actual reporting on what works and what doesn't.

It's been a fair while since any member of Canada's generally lap-dog media hit the nail on the head quite this accurately!

And no misses Chretien since he resigned as Prime Minister last month and quit his seat in the House Of Commons from St. Maurice, the district that includes his hometown of Shawinigan. Of course Paul Martin is also from Quebec but he's not a Quebecois. He was born in Windsor, Ontario.

2 posted on 01/23/2004 6:46:05 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)

This message has been deleted by the Royale Canadian Mounted Police.

THanks for posting..a really, REALLY good article, a nice rant byu the authoress....sounds like she's auditioning to be the Canadian Ann Coulter...tell me she's a babe, to boot?

Canada is to the U.S. as a student council is to the school administration.

7 posted on 01/23/2004 7:23:44 AM PST by VaBthang4 (-He who watches over Israel neither slumbers nor sleeps-)

Sorry, I don't really follow your anaolgy.

In my view, it's more aptly a cautionary example.

As examples, in the areas of the disruptiveness towards national unity of a 2nd language (French = Spanish), state-imposed multiculturalism and related general political-correctness and, especially, the threat to individual liberties posed by an over-centralized big government.

8 posted on 01/23/2004 7:35:34 AM PST by GMMAC ( lots of terror cells in Canada - I'll be waving my US flag when the Marines arrive!)

9 posted on 01/23/2004 9:01:39 AM PST by knighthawk (Live today, there is no time to lose, because when tomorrow comes it's all just yesterday's blues)

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.