To: philosofy123
There are a variety of ways to kill Osama, if that's the issue. But all of them involve finding out precisely where he's at. If he's in Iran, they ain't gonna tell.
It might be a great reason to invade Iran, but once we got it we gotta do something with it. I guess in Iran with their large democratic movement already in place that we could just do a quick regime change there, and then get leave.
But, I think they'd move Osama at first hint of a US invasion.
A missile and exact location would be easiest.
80 posted on
01/23/2004 7:35:37 AM PST by
xzins
(Retired Army and Proud of It!!)
To: xzins
If the US had invaded Iran or Saudi Arabia first instead of messing around with secular Iraq, we would have been so far ahead of the game with the Moslem terrorists. Bush chose to call it "The War on Terror"! I would like to correct him, respectfully, Mr. President, it is "The War on MOSLEM Terrorists". As a matter of fact, I would have taken this one further step, by aligning the secular Moslem dictators; Saddam of Iraq, Assad of Syria, Mubarak of Egypt, Abdullah of Jordon to fight against Iran, and Saudi Arabia. We managed to do that in the last gulf war. Once you have Moslems on your side the attacks on Iran, and Saudi Arabia would not be considered CRUSADERS invasion.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson