You are asking for proof of a future event.
If I could do that, do you think I'd be wasting time with you morons?!??! I'd be cashing my Lotto checks!
Nice try, though.
Why shouldn't I ask you for proof since you are posting as if it is an already done deal. I'm just asking you how you've come to that decision.
C'mon Laz...you said that "He said it", but then try to turn it around by saying you can't provide proof of a future event? All we are asking for is the statement that you stated Bush made. If he made a statement about pushing for and signing a more restrictive AWB, it would be a past event...so provide a quote please. Otherwise, you are merely using your crystal ball to spread disinformation...that's not like you.
If I could do that, do you think I'd be wasting time with you morons?!??! I'd be cashing my Lotto checks!
In other words, when you say things, you are just blowing smoke out of your exit orifice.
And you're engaging in sheer speculation over a future event. Bush has always been squishy on the assault weapons issue, but the White House thoughtfully warned members of Congress that if they wanted the AW Ban to die, they'd have to deal with it themselves.
I see nothing to suggest that there will be any cheerleading from the White House urging representatives and Senators to pass a replacement for that law.
A new Assault Weapons Ban - even if it's a redux of the current version with no ups or extras - is a political toe tag with George Bush's name on it.