Skip to comments.
Just Another "Illigration" Rant
(of no relation to Gray)
| 1-22-2004
| R. K. Davis
Posted on 01/22/2004 8:05:55 AM PST by azhenfud
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
1
posted on
01/22/2004 8:05:56 AM PST
by
azhenfud
To: azhenfud
The most crucial battlelines in the defense of America are our borders.>>>>>>
BUMP....
2
posted on
01/22/2004 8:14:22 AM PST
by
txdoda
("Navy-brat")
To: azhenfud
Who said this was going to be enacted? I think the only thing to come of this will be to identify law breakers.
3
posted on
01/22/2004 8:19:23 AM PST
by
Liberty Valance
(Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
To: azhenfud
The immigrants can't afford decent housing? Of course they can't. They caused the price rise, thich is 5 times the rate of inflation every year. Listen carefully boys and girls. It's a simple case of supply and demand. In 1776 there are 300 million square miles of territory in America; in 2004 there is also this land area. Since 1965, thanks to Ted Kennedy, we have had a million and a half new people in our country each and every year. That's what runs up the prices. Therefore, the only way to re-create affordable housing again would be to deport all those people so land prices would resume their previous levels.
Comment #5 Removed by Moderator
To: azhenfud
Thanks!
BTW.........Did you happen to see Newt last night on O'Reilly? When asked about the Illegaliens he shrugged his shoulders and basically said, "There's nothing that can be done", which enraged O'Reilly even more; then, time ran out on the segment.
Don't get me wrong here, I'm a fan of Newt because of the fiscal restraint he exercised during his tenure as Speaker of the House versus the profligate pork-spending that is going on now.......but THATS another subject. {LOL}
The REAL REASON I'm bringing his comments up is that I immediately asked myself, "Do Newt's comments reflect the unspoken policies of the government? Has our government thrown up it's hands and given up on even trying to control this problem? Is the Bush Administration resigned to not even making an attempt?".
It appeared, "Yes", to all of the above from what he said.
6
posted on
01/22/2004 8:31:18 AM PST
by
DoctorMichael
(Thats my story, and I'm sticking to it.)
To: DoctorMichael
I really just don't get it, the real reason behind it that is. I live in TN and in today's KnoxNews you read of a big outsourcing conference in New York, then you read how China and other countries are buying up US debt, not to mention the loss of US jobs overseas and the influx of immigrants. I am procapitalist too, but I find myself agreeing with another poster on Freeper that they are going to hang themselves with their own noose.
7
posted on
01/22/2004 9:06:46 AM PST
by
PersonalLiberties
(Between Life and the Pursuit of Happiness you Need Liberty www.personalliberties.com)
To: azhenfud
Rant away because I've been doing the same thing on www.washingtonvotes.org A reply to my rant about giving illegal aliens resident tuition came from a person located at a state university. This person lobbied for the bill to be passed (which was in March 2003). This person indicated diversity was at the root of his/her cause. However, my thinking is that out of the hundreds of millions of American citizens a person can't find diversity in the population that large but need to recruit criminals to provide that diversity. Give me a break! The excuse of diversity is a copout.
To: *immigrant_list; A Navy Vet; Lion Den Dan; Free the USA; Libertarianize the GOP; madfly; B4Ranch; ..
ping
To: DoctorMichael
The Feds don't have any problem enforcing environmental laws, tax laws, workplace discrimination laws, or "civil rights" laws. They have the gall to tell us that there is "no way" they can enforce immigration laws! The bottom line is that they will enforce the laws they want to enforce.
10
posted on
01/22/2004 10:15:02 AM PST
by
wjcsux
(If you can read this, you are in range.)
To: wjcsux
"....Feds don't have any problem enforcing environmental laws, tax laws, workplace discrimination laws, or "civil rights" laws...." Damn good point!
11
posted on
01/22/2004 10:24:11 AM PST
by
DoctorMichael
(Thats my story, and I'm sticking to it.)
To: azhenfud
The President's plan appears more as a bid to exclude a powerful business class of felons from prosecution - a class which has a strong monitary influence in Washington. This plan isn't an honest attempt at strengthening the security of America's borders nor her citizens - but far from it. This plan isn't even truthfully about "compassion" for those who illegally infiltrate our borders - but exactly the opposite. This plan is a bold attempt to secure amnesty for felons who are guilty of undermining America's sovereignty and secure felon employers an unending supply of "cheap" labor. Very well said. This sellout must not pass.
12
posted on
01/22/2004 10:37:43 AM PST
by
jimt
To: wjcsux
Feds enforcing laws
You hit that right on the head. They are not going to do nothing, because they do not want to.
Big money is behind all of it.
We are turning from a nation of laws, into a nation of men, who think the laws only apply if they wish them to do so.
To: jimt
SCAMNESTY . . .
The next Watergate?
14
posted on
01/22/2004 10:50:02 AM PST
by
TLI
(...........ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA..........)
To: wjcsux
Good points! I've wondered all along, if the US Gov. is so inept it can't enforce the laws currently on the book, how in the world are they going to keep track of all these illegals when their 3-year limit is up? You're right: If you think the U.S. can't enforce laws, try not paying your taxes come April 15th and see what happens.
To: TLI
Damnasty!!
To: EagleMamaMT
Newt Gingrich once made the following comment. "The U.S. government doesn't have the personnel to secure the borders or control contraband coming into the country. However, they have an ample number of people to audit thousands of tax returns a year."
17
posted on
01/22/2004 12:48:13 PM PST
by
wjcsux
(If you can read this, you are in range.)
To: jimt
I believe this whole amnesty for illegals mess is just the flip side of the outsourcing craze and the purpose of both fiascos is to help the globalists accomplish their agenda: The greatest wealth transfer in the history of the world, that being the transfer of the assets and property of the U.S. middle class into the coffers of the globalists, both personally as well as governmental. Look for the FOGs (Friends of George) to become wealthy beyond all imagination in the near future. What's truly ironic is that so many of the people championing these two agendas (outsourcing and amnesty for illegals) will be cannon fodder for the FOGs in the end, too, once they've served their usefulness.
To: wjcsux
I'll certainly agree with that statement. Gotta enforce those tax laws, ya'know, to keep feeding that Washington pork.
To: monkeywrench
Uh... here we go!
SHAMNESTY
20
posted on
01/22/2004 1:42:30 PM PST
by
TLI
(...........ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA..........)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson