Just Another "Illigration" Rant

(of no relation to Gray) | 1-22-2004 | R. K. Davis

[azhenfud]

According to what's been proposed so far of the President's plan for Illegaliens, America will offer them a chance to "register" and "stay for three years" (as if they would); they now can bring as many as five family members into this country.

With currently an estimated 8-12 million Illegaliens in America, that's a potentially new total of 48-72 million. The originally registered Illegalien can't support those five new, so six are now on the public dole - since the first realized early on that not reporting all his income means plenty of "public assistance".

Three of the six become pregnant and have two "anchor babies" each before the second year ends, effectively ending most chances of deportation when the third year passes without anyone re-registering. None of the potential 144 million are "registered" now and none can be deported.

We now have a small country of 144 million residing within our borders on the public dole and, pity them, they can't "afford decent" housing which, to their relief, a "fix" is now being proposed by our President. Never mind that in many cases in their native land, their house would have otherwise been mud, sticks, and tin - if they're lucky. Now they can't put a down payment on a home because it ties up hundreds of millions of dollars they're otherwise pumping back home - along with the letters telling the rest of the family to be packing up - come to America.

Within the first three years of enactment, this proposal has the potential to unleash another 40-60 million new "immigrants" into already overburdened schools, neighborhoods, and - yes - prisons.

It has not yet come to realization in Washington that a well intentioned amnesty for 2.7 million in 1989 by President Reagan leading to 8-12 million today, without reinforcing and enforcing our Immigration Code, another well intentioned amnesty for 8-12 million will lead to a minimum ADDITIONAL 40 million, with a potential of 144 million in the near future.

The current Immigration Code, if properly applied and enforced, clearly makes hiring, aiding, and/or harboring Illegaliens a felony. There are provisions in the law that allow individual citizen recourse against those who illegally employ Illegaliens, including filing of racketeering and corruption charges. It's also possible any forged federal and state documents and false tax filings lead to additional charges against the felon employer.

The President's plan appears more as a bid to exclude a powerful business class of felons from prosecution - a class which has a strong monitary influence in Washington. This plan isn't an honest attempt at strengthening the security of America's borders nor her citizens - but far from it. This plan isn't even truthfully about "compassion" for those who illegally infiltrate our borders - but exactly the opposite. This plan is a bold attempt to secure amnesty for felons who are guilty of undermining America's sovereignty and secure felon employers an unending supply of "cheap" labor.

It is these felons that, as a cumulative result of their actions and the refusal of the judiciary to penalize violators:

1) through their complicity of tax evasion have cheated every American taxpaying citizen by reporting a disproportionate share of tax - yet overwhelmingly welcome any/all government tax breaks,

2) through their greed for "cheap" labor have encouraged and sometimes assisted in the illegal misuse of taxpayer funded goods and services by those Illegaliens, and

3) through the use of artificially "cheap" labor, have retarded the American standard of living's relationship to normal, healthy economic growth.

Clearly, "cheap" is not as much a character of the laborer, in as much as it is of the felon employer who illegally hires them.

If this proposal were an honest attempt to strengthen America's borders and an aim toward a sensible, acceptable immigration policy, there would first be a proposal to hugely increase funding for current USBICE enforcement officers as well as funding for additional field officers and an executive order barring a liberal judiciary from obstructing justice.

We need a realisticly enforcable immigration policy, one with an increased number of green cards issued and shorter wait terms for those who legally abide by our laws. We need a policy with more severe penalties for violators and more conviction success rates of those who illegally hire or aid Illegaliens. We want a policy empowering those charged with securing our borders with full, unhindered apprehension, detention, and removal responsibilities of first, the undocumented, then the expired visa violators.

We need a Congress and a President who will place the task of ensuring and protecting America's sovereignty and the security of her citizens above the politically negotiable. Finally, we need citizens who will no longer remain passive over the issue of Illegaliens, but become personally involved. Americans can and must take back American soil, one situation, one line at a time. The most crucial battlelines in the defense of America are our borders.

[txdoda]

The most crucial battlelines in the defense of America are our borders.>>>>>>

BUMP....

[Liberty Valance]

Who said this was going to be enacted? I think the only thing to come of this will be to identify law breakers.

[henderson field]

The immigrants can't afford decent housing? Of course they can't. They caused the price rise, thich is 5 times the rate of inflation every year. Listen carefully boys and girls. It's a simple case of supply and demand. In 1776 there are 300 million square miles of territory in America; in 2004 there is also this land area. Since 1965, thanks to Ted Kennedy, we have had a million and a half new people in our country each and every year. That's what runs up the prices. Therefore, the only way to re-create affordable housing again would be to deport all those people so land prices would resume their previous levels.

[DoctorMichael]

Thanks!

BTW.........Did you happen to see Newt last night on O'Reilly? When asked about the Illegaliens he shrugged his shoulders and basically said, "There's nothing that can be done", which enraged O'Reilly even more; then, time ran out on the segment.

Don't get me wrong here, I'm a fan of Newt because of the fiscal restraint he exercised during his tenure as Speaker of the House versus the profligate pork-spending that is going on now.......but THATS another subject. {LOL}

The REAL REASON I'm bringing his comments up is that I immediately asked myself, "Do Newt's comments reflect the unspoken policies of the government? Has our government thrown up it's hands and given up on even trying to control this problem? Is the Bush Administration resigned to not even making an attempt?".

It appeared, "Yes", to all of the above from what he said.

[PersonalLiberties]

I really just don't get it, the real reason behind it that is. I live in TN and in today's KnoxNews you read of a big outsourcing conference in New York, then you read how China and other countries are buying up US debt, not to mention the loss of US jobs overseas and the influx of immigrants. I am procapitalist too, but I find myself agreeing with another poster on Freeper that they are going to hang themselves with their own noose.

[lilylangtree]

Rant away because I've been doing the same thing on www.washingtonvotes.org A reply to my rant about giving illegal aliens resident tuition came from a person located at a state university. This person lobbied for the bill to be passed (which was in March 2003). This person indicated diversity was at the root of his/her cause. However, my thinking is that out of the hundreds of millions of American citizens a person can't find diversity in the population that large but need to recruit criminals to provide that diversity. Give me a break! The excuse of diversity is a copout.

[gubamyster]

ping

[wjcsux]

The Feds don't have any problem enforcing environmental laws, tax laws, workplace discrimination laws, or "civil rights" laws. They have the gall to tell us that there is "no way" they can enforce immigration laws! The bottom line is that they will enforce the laws they want to enforce.

[DoctorMichael]

"....Feds don't have any problem enforcing environmental laws, tax laws, workplace discrimination laws, or "civil rights" laws...."

Damn good point!

[jimt]

The President's plan appears more as a bid to exclude a powerful business class of felons from prosecution - a class which has a strong monitary influence in Washington. This plan isn't an honest attempt at strengthening the security of America's borders nor her citizens - but far from it. This plan isn't even truthfully about "compassion" for those who illegally infiltrate our borders - but exactly the opposite. This plan is a bold attempt to secure amnesty for felons who are guilty of undermining America's sovereignty and secure felon employers an unending supply of "cheap" labor.

Very well said. This sellout must not pass.

[calawah98]

Feds enforcing laws

You hit that right on the head. They are not going to do nothing, because they do not want to.
Big money is behind all of it.

We are turning from a nation of laws, into a nation of men, who think the laws only apply if they wish them to do so.

[TLI]

SCAMNESTY . . .

The next Watergate?

[EagleMamaMT]

Good points! I've wondered all along, if the US Gov. is so inept it can't enforce the laws currently on the book, how in the world are they going to keep track of all these illegals when their 3-year limit is up? You're right: If you think the U.S. can't enforce laws, try not paying your taxes come April 15th and see what happens.

[monkeywrench]

Damnasty!!

[wjcsux]

Newt Gingrich once made the following comment. "The U.S. government doesn't have the personnel to secure the borders or control contraband coming into the country. However, they have an ample number of people to audit thousands of tax returns a year."

[EagleMamaMT]

I believe this whole amnesty for illegals mess is just the flip side of the outsourcing craze and the purpose of both fiascos is to help the globalists accomplish their agenda: The greatest wealth transfer in the history of the world, that being the transfer of the assets and property of the U.S. middle class into the coffers of the globalists, both personally as well as governmental. Look for the FOGs (Friends of George) to become wealthy beyond all imagination in the near future. What's truly ironic is that so many of the people championing these two agendas (outsourcing and amnesty for illegals) will be cannon fodder for the FOGs in the end, too, once they've served their usefulness.

[EagleMamaMT]

I'll certainly agree with that statement. Gotta enforce those tax laws, ya'know, to keep feeding that Washington pork.

[TLI]

Uh... here we go!

SHAMNESTY